# Shareuhack.com Knowledge Base (EN - LLM Optimized) Generated: 2026-02-24T17:27:12.385Z Protocol: https://llms.txt (Draft Concept) Description: Technical documentation and how-to guides from Shareuhack.com (en). Language: en --- ## Index - [Cursor vs Claude Code vs Windsurf vs OpenCode: The Definitive 2026 AI Coding Tool Comparison](#cursor-vs-claude-code-vs-windsurf-2026) - [OpenCode vs Anthropic Case: The Open vs Closed Debate Over AI Coding Tools in 2026](#opencode-anthropic-legal-controversy-2026) - [The Complete Guide to Making LINE Stickers with AI: Step-by-Step Process and the Truth About Earnings](#ai-line-sticker-passive-income) - [AI-Era PM Skill Upgrade Roadmap — From 'Using ChatGPT' to Systematic AI Competency](#ai-pm-skill-roadmap-2026) - [AI Presentation Tools Comparison 2026: Gamma, Beautiful.ai, Canva, NotebookLM, and Copilot Reviewed](#ai-presentation-tools-comparison) - [The Complete Guide to Claude Code Costs: Lessons from the OpenClaw OAuth Lockout on Choosing Between Pro, Max, and API](#openclaw-claude-code-oauth-cost) - [2026 PMP Certification Guide: Exam Changes, Study Strategy & An Honest Assessment of Whether It's Worth It](#pmp-certification-guide-2026) - [What Is Drop Servicing? A Complete Guide to This Low-Cost Business Model in the AI Era](#what-is-drop-servicing) - [GitHub Trending Weekly 2026-02-18: Official AI Toolchains, Skills Ecosystem Forming, Backend Engineering Strikes Back](#github-trending-weekly-2026-02-18) - [AI Textbook Automation Workflow for Developers: Claude Code + Pandoc](#ai-textbook-automation-developers) - [No-Code AI Personal Textbook: The Complete Learner's Guide](#ai-textbook-generator-no-code) - [Self-Hosted AI Assistant Guide: OpenClaw vs. NanoClaw vs. Nanobot vs. PicoClaw Security & Performance Comparison (2026)](#openclaw-alternatives-guide) - [How to Plan Travel with AI: Real-World Experience and a Complete Avoid-Pitfalls Guide](#ai-travel-planning-guide) - [2026 Crypto Card Guide: From S-Tier God Cards to "Look But Don't Touch" Options](#2026-crypto-card-guide) - [Claude Code UX Researcher: Automated Competitor Benchmarking with AI Agents](#claude-code-ux-researcher) - [Multi-AI Orchestration: Combining Specialized Tools for High-Quality Content](#multi-ai-collaboration-workflow) - [OpenClaw Setup Guide 2026: Is It Worth the Security Risk? Honest Decision Framework](#should-i-setup-an-openclaw) - [Zero-Maintenance Feedback: Building a Telegram + AI Vision Triage Bot](#telegram-feedback-bot-ai-vision) - [Ikyu.com Booking Guide: Japanese vs International Version & Why It Beats Official Sites](#why-ikyu-often-beats-official-hotel-sites) - [The PRD Revolution: A High-Efficiency Offline-First Git-like Workflow](#claude-code-prd-workflow) - [PM Workflow Revolution: Integrating Claude Code, Skills & Sub-Agents (English Version)](#pm-workflow-revolution-claude) - [2026 Affiliate Marketing Guide: Platform Commissions, Real Income Data & Survival Strategies for the AI Era](#what-is-affiliate-marketing) - [How to Apply for a Refund of Agoda Foreign Transaction Fee?](#how-to-get-agoda-transaction-fee-back) - [3 Secrets of the Law of Attraction: Attract What You Love!](#law-of-attraction) - [Complete Beginner's Guide to Meditation: How to Meditate Successfully with 5 Science-Backed Steps](#meditation-101) - [Must-Know Free and Practical Project Management Tools - Slack/Trello/Todoist](#nice-free-tools-for-managing-your-work-and-life) - [Transform Your Life with Daily Rituals: Learn to Create Meaningful Practices](#sense-of-ritual-best-practice) - [Why the Eisenhower Matrix Keeps Failing You — and How to Fix It in 2026](#use-time-matrix-to-make-life-easier) - [Master Your Money and Life: Top Tips from Amazon’s Bestsellers](#learn-to-financial-freedom-from-amazon-bestsellers) - [Best resources for learning negotiation](#best-resources-to-learn-negotiation) - [How to Land a Front-End Engineer Job in 3 Months](#how-to-become-a-frontend-engineer) - [Here's how you can crack the PMP exam!](#how-to-get-pmp-2021) --- ## Cursor vs Claude Code vs Windsurf vs OpenCode: The Definitive 2026 AI Coding Tool Comparison URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/cursor-vs-claude-code-vs-windsurf-2026 Date: 2026-02-20 Tools: Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, OpenCode Concepts: AI Coding Tools, Agentic IDE, Context Window, SWE-bench, Open Source vs Closed Source ### Summary A comprehensive comparison of Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, and OpenCode — covering pricing, real-world benchmarks, the Anthropic OAuth crackdown, and a decision framework to help you pick the right tool. ### Content # Cursor vs Claude Code vs Windsurf vs OpenCode: The Definitive 2026 AI Coding Tool Comparison In 2026, AI coding tools are no longer a question of "should I use one?" — it's "which one should I use?" Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, and OpenCode each have loyal followings, with features iterating monthly, wildly different pricing models, and the Anthropic third-party crackdown adding another layer of complexity. This article covers design philosophy, real-world test scenarios, pricing breakdowns, and ecosystem analysis to help you make the best decision for your workflow. --- ## TL;DR - **Cursor**: The most polished IDE experience — fastest Tab completions, best for developers who prefer the VS Code ecosystem - **Claude Code**: A terminal-native AI agent — hits 80.9% on SWE-bench with Opus 4.5, ideal for large-scale refactors and automated tasks - **Windsurf**: The cheapest agentic IDE at $15/month — Cascade maintains persistent project context, great for budget-conscious developers - **OpenCode**: Fully open-source (MIT License), supports 75+ models, 100K+ GitHub stars — perfect for developers who demand model freedom and privacy - **The best 2026 strategy is combining tools**: Match different tools to different tasks rather than going all-in on one --- ## 1. Quick Comparison Table | Feature | Cursor | Claude Code | Windsurf | OpenCode | |---------|--------|-------------|----------|----------| | **Positioning** | AI IDE (VS Code fork) | Terminal AI Agent | Agentic IDE | Open-source AI coding agent | | **Pricing** | $20/mo Pro / $60 Pro+ / $200 Ultra | $20/mo Pro / $100-200/mo Max / API pay-as-you-go | $15/mo Pro | Free (BYO API Key) / Zen pay-as-you-go / Black $20-200/mo | | **Interface** | GUI (VS Code) | Terminal (CLI) | GUI (custom IDE) | TUI + Desktop App + IDE extensions | | **Context Window** | Nominally 200K+, effective ~70-120K | 200K (fully utilized) | Cascade persistent context | Depends on underlying model | | **Model Support** | Claude / GPT-4o / Gemini etc. | Claude family only | Multi-model | 75+ providers (including local models) | | **SWE-bench** | — | 72.7–80.9% (model-dependent) | — | Depends on underlying model | | **Open Source** | No | No | No | MIT License | | **GitHub Stars** | — | — | — | 100K+ | > **Note**: Pricing and features are current as of February 2026. AI tools iterate rapidly — always check official sites for the latest information. --- ## 2. Design Philosophy: Four Fundamentally Different Approaches Understanding these four tools starts with recognizing that their **design philosophies** are fundamentally different. ### Cursor: Adding AI Where You Already Work Cursor is a VS Code fork whose core strategy is to give you **AI capabilities without changing your habits**. Your shortcuts, extensions, and settings all carry over. Tab completions, Cmd+K inline edits, and Composer multi-file refactors are all integrated directly into the IDE. This "layer AI on top of an existing experience" approach has helped Cursor reach over 1 million users, with more than 360,000 paid subscribers. For most developers, the learning curve is essentially zero. But this also means limitations: Cursor is fundamentally still an editor, with AI as an "add-on feature." In scenarios requiring cross-file, long-running autonomous execution, its agentic capabilities fall short. ### Claude Code: AI *Is* the Interface Claude Code takes the opposite approach: **no GUI — the terminal is everything**. You give it natural language instructions, and it reads code, writes code, runs tests, and fixes bugs on its own. From real-world usage, Claude Code clearly outperforms other tools on large refactoring tasks. Its 200K context window is genuinely usable (unlike some tools that advertise 200K but effectively handle only 70-120K), with token efficiency roughly 5.5x better than Cursor. Paired with Claude Opus 4.5, it achieves an 80.9% SWE-bench Verified score — the highest of any publicly benchmarked system. Even with Sonnet 4, it scores 72.7%. The trade-off: the pure terminal experience has a higher learning curve, there's no live preview, and developers unfamiliar with the CLI will need an adjustment period. Plus, it only supports Claude models — you're locked into the Anthropic ecosystem. ### Windsurf: The Budget Agentic IDE Windsurf bills itself as "the world's first agentic IDE." Its key differentiator is **Cascade** — an AI system that maintains persistent understanding of your entire project context. Unlike other tools that reload context with each conversation, Cascade remembers what you've done before. The Wave 13 update added Parallel Multi-Agent Sessions, letting you run multiple AI agents on different tasks simultaneously. Arena Mode lets you blind-test output quality across different models. At $15/month — 25% cheaper than Cursor — it's compelling for budget-conscious individual developers. However, its community size and extension ecosystem are much smaller than Cursor's. ### OpenCode: Model Freedom and Open-Source Conviction OpenCode is the only fully open-source tool of the four (MIT License), developed by Anomaly Innovations (the team behind SST/Serverless Stack). As of February 2026, it has accumulated over 100K GitHub stars and surpassed 2.5M monthly active developers (per official data). Its core proposition is **model freedom**: support for 75+ LLM providers, from Claude and GPT to Gemini and even Ollama local models. You're not locked into any single AI vendor. The architecture uses Go with Bubble Tea TUI, following a client/server model with support for remote Docker execution. OpenCode also offers a Desktop App and IDE extensions (VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains, Zed, Neovim, Emacs) — the broadest coverage of any tool here. However, OpenCode's performance depends entirely on your chosen model. It doesn't optimize models itself, so running the same task may be considerably slower than Claude Code (benchmark data shows 16 min 20 sec vs 9 min 09 sec). It also lacks instant rollback — you'll need to manage that yourself with git. --- ## 3. Real-World Scenario Comparison: What's Each Tool Best At? Spec sheets only tell part of the story. Based on multiple independent test reports and hands-on experience, here's how each tool performs across different scenarios. ### Scenario 1: Frontend UI Development (React/Next.js Components) | Tool | Rating | Notes | |------|--------|-------| | **Cursor** | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Tab completions + live preview — the smoothest frontend dev experience | | **Claude Code** | ⭐⭐⭐ | Generates complete components, but no live preview — requires switching to the browser | | **Windsurf** | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Cascade understands inter-component relationships, though UI output occasionally has flaws | | **OpenCode** | ⭐⭐⭐ | Depends on the underlying model; IDE extension mode approaches Cursor's experience | **Verdict**: For frontend UI work, Cursor's real-time completions and VS Code ecosystem (ESLint, Prettier, DevTools) are unmatched. ### Scenario 2: Large-Scale Refactoring (20+ Files) | Tool | Rating | Notes | |------|--------|-------| | **Cursor** | ⭐⭐ | Composer can handle it, but beyond 10 files it tends to lose track and miss changes | | **Claude Code** | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | 200K context + high autonomy — large refactors are its home turf | | **Windsurf** | ⭐⭐⭐ | Cascade's persistent context helps, but stability still falls short of Claude Code | | **OpenCode** | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Performs well with Claude models, and the open-source ecosystem makes CI/CD integration easy | **Verdict**: Choose Claude Code for large refactors. The 200K real context window and high token efficiency make the biggest difference here. ### Scenario 3: Bug Fixing and Debugging | Tool | Rating | Notes | |------|--------|-------| | **Cursor** | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Cmd+K quickly pinpoints issues — great for small-scope fixes | | **Claude Code** | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Autonomously reads logs, runs tests, and iterates on fixes — strongest self-directed capability | | **Windsurf** | ⭐⭐⭐ | Plan Mode helps clarify the debugging approach | | **OpenCode** | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Terminal-native + model switching lets you pick the right model for different bug types | **Verdict**: Quick bugs? Cursor. Complex bugs? Let Claude Code investigate autonomously. ### Scenario 4: Comprehensive Development Test (Refactoring, Debugging, and Testing) Based on the [Builder.io benchmark report](https://www.builder.io/blog/opencode-vs-claude-code) (for a fair comparison, **both tools were configured to use the Claude Sonnet 4.5 model**), comparing Claude Code and OpenCode in handling complex development tasks: - **Cross-file variable rename**: Both completed in about 3 minutes. However, OpenCode blindly replaced everything including comments, whereas Claude Code preserved conceptual descriptions in comments, modifying only the code logic and demonstrating more nuanced text comprehension. - **Debugging (fixing a hidden type error)**: Both perfectly identified and fixed the bug within 40 seconds. - **Refactoring shared logic**: Both successfully extracted the common function (taking about 2-3 minutes). - **Writing unit tests from scratch**: This is where their design philosophies diverged the most: - **Claude Code**: Built for speed. Wrote 73 tests and verified they passed, taking **3 minutes and 12 seconds**. - **OpenCode**: Built for thoroughness. Wrote 94 tests, automatically ran `pnpm install` to ensure a clean environment, and executed the entire project's 200+ tests to ensure no regressions occurred, taking **9 minutes and 11 seconds**. **Verdict**: - **Claude Code**: Built for speed. Reaches the finish line in the shortest time possible, suitable for rapidly advancing projects. - **OpenCode**: Built for thoroughness. Operates on the assumption that the environment is chaotic and performs comprehensive checks, ideal for scenarios demanding high test coverage and stability. --- ## 4. Pricing Deep Dive: What Will You Actually Pay? Pricing is what developers care about most — but also where they're most easily misled. The sticker price and your actual spend can be very different. ### Pricing Structure by Tool #### Cursor | Plan | Monthly Cost | What You Get | |------|-------------|-------------| | Free | $0 | Basic completions, 50 slow premium requests | | Pro | $20/mo ($16 annual) | Unlimited completions + $20 monthly credit pool | | Pro+ | $60/mo | 3x Pro credits + Background Agents | | Ultra | $200/mo | 20x Pro credits + early access to new features | | Teams | $40/user/mo | Pro + SSO + admin console | > **Important change**: Cursor switched to **credit-based billing** in June 2025. The $20/month Pro plan includes a $20 credit pool — using premium models like Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5 burns credits faster. Your actual experience may vary depending on model choice. #### Claude Code | Plan | Monthly Cost | What You Get | |------|-------------|-------------| | Pro | $20/mo | Includes Claude Code usage (shared with claude.ai) | | Max 5x | $100/mo | 5x Pro usage | | Max 20x | $200/mo | 20x Pro usage | | API | Pay-as-you-go | Average ~$6/day (Anthropic data: 90% of developers stay under $12/day) | > **Watch out**: Pro/Max plan quotas are shared with the claude.ai web interface and Desktop app. If you chat frequently on the web, your Claude Code quota gets squeezed. For a deeper analysis, see [Claude Code Cost Guide](/posts/openclaw-claude-code-oauth-cost). #### Windsurf | Plan | Monthly Cost | What You Get | |------|-------------|-------------| | Free | $0 | 25 credits/month + unlimited SWE-1 Lite | | Pro | $15/mo | 500 credits/month (~$20 value) + SWE-1 model | | Teams | $30/user/mo | Pro + centralized billing + admin controls | Windsurf has the cheapest paid plan of the four — 25% less than Cursor. It also uses a credit system, with premium model usage consuming credits. #### OpenCode | Plan | Cost | What You Get | |------|------|-------------| | Core tool | Free | MIT open-source, bring your own API key | | OpenCode Zen | Pay-as-you-go | Curated model gateway, per-token billing (at-cost + processing fee) | | Black 20 | $20/mo | Access to all major models (Claude, GPT, Gemini, etc.) | | Black 100 | $100/mo | 5x Black 20 usage | | Black 200 | $200/mo | 20x Black 20 usage (limited availability) | OpenCode's free tier is genuinely free — but you need your own LLM API key. Zen is the at-cost option with no markup, just a processing fee. Black is a subscription model similar to Cursor/Claude Max, providing direct access to multiple models without needing your own keys. ### Monthly Cost Estimates: Three Usage Levels Assuming Claude Sonnet 4 as the primary model (input $3/MTok, output $15/MTok): | Usage Level | Cursor | Claude Code | Windsurf | OpenCode (BYO Claude API Key) | |-------------|--------|-------------|----------|-------------------------------| | Light (~30 min/day) | $20 (Pro sufficient) | $20 (Pro sufficient) | $15 | ~$30-60/mo (API costs) | | Moderate (2-3 hrs/day) | $20-60 (Pro or Pro+) | $100-200 (Max) | $15 (may run out of credits) | ~$120-180/mo (API costs) | | Heavy (6+ hrs/day) | $60-200 (Pro+ or Ultra) | $200+ (Max 20x or API) | $15+ (need add-on credits) | ~$300-500/mo (API costs) | > In TWD (1 USD ≈ 32 TWD): Cursor Pro ≈ 640 TWD/mo, Windsurf Pro ≈ 480 TWD/mo, Claude Code Max 20x ≈ 6,400 TWD/mo. **Key insights**: 1. **Light users**: Windsurf at $15 is the best deal, or Cursor at $20 for the most complete IDE experience 2. **Moderate users**: Claude Code Max 5x ($100) is the value sweet spot 3. **Heavy users**: Claude Code Max 20x ($200) is much cheaper than equivalent API usage; OpenCode + API actually becomes the most expensive at heavy usage 4. **Zero budget**: OpenCode free + free models (e.g., Ollama running CodeLlama locally) is the only option, but the performance gap is significant --- ## 5. The Ecosystem Battle: Anthropic's Crackdown and Open vs Closed On January 9, 2026, Anthropic deployed server-side protections to block all unauthorized OAuth token access. This was more than a technical incident — it marked a watershed moment for the AI tools ecosystem. ### What Happened? OpenCode (formerly OpenClaw) had been spoofing Claude Code's HTTP headers, allowing users to access Claude models using their Claude Pro/Max subscription OAuth tokens. Combined with an automated loop technique the community dubbed "Ralph Wiggum," users could run AI agents overnight non-stop, causing infrastructure costs to balloon. Anthropic's response was blunt: block all third-party OAuth access and temporarily suspend some accounts. > **Full analysis**: [Claude Code Cost Guide: How the OpenClaw OAuth Ban Helps You Choose Between Pro/Max/API](/posts/openclaw-claude-code-oauth-cost) ### Community Reactions - **DHH** (Ruby on Rails creator) publicly called it a "terrible policy" - **George Hotz** (tinygrad founder) wrote [Anthropic is making a huge mistake](https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/01/15/anthropic-huge-mistake.html) - **OpenAI** moved to work with OpenCode on Codex integration, welcoming it to connect with GPT-series models - OpenCode committed `973715f` (titled "anthropic legal requests"), officially removing Claude OAuth support and switching to OpenAI Codex, GitHub, GitLab, and other alternative providers ### What This Means for Developers This incident made the "open vs closed ecosystem" choice very real: | Dimension | Closed Ecosystem (Claude Code) | Open Ecosystem (OpenCode) | |-----------|-------------------------------|--------------------------| | **Model Quality** | Claude family — currently highest coding benchmarks | Depends on which model you choose | | **Stability** | Anthropic controls everything — can cut access at will | Open-source community maintained, but depends on external APIs | | **Cost** | Subscription pricing is predictable, but Max plans aren't cheap | API pay-as-you-go — can get more expensive at heavy usage | | **Privacy** | Your code goes through Anthropic's servers | Local model option available — fully offline | | **Vendor Risk** | Heavily dependent on Anthropic's policies | Can switch models anytime | **Pragmatic take**: The crackdown showed that betting everything on a single ecosystem carries real risk. Even if you're happy with Claude Code today, it's worth familiarizing yourself with at least one alternative. For more alternatives, see [OpenClaw Alternatives Guide](/posts/openclaw-alternatives-guide). --- ## 6. Tool Combination Strategies: 2026 Best Practices Based on real-world experience, the best 2026 strategy isn't picking one tool — it's **combining tools based on the task at hand**. ### Recommended Combinations #### Combo A: Primary IDE + Refactoring Specialist (Most Popular) - **Daily development**: Cursor (Tab completions + frontend preview) - **Large refactors / automation**: Claude Code (200K context + agentic capabilities) - **Monthly cost**: $20 + $20-200 = $40-220/mo #### Combo B: Budget Priority - **Daily development**: Windsurf ($15, feature-complete enough) - **Special tasks**: OpenCode + Claude API key (on-demand) - **Monthly cost**: $15 + API usage #### Combo C: Open-Source Conviction + Maximum Flexibility - **Primary tool**: OpenCode (IDE extension mode integrated into VS Code) - **Model selection**: GPT-4o for everyday tasks (cheaper), Claude Sonnet 4 for critical work (best results) - **Monthly cost**: Pure API costs — pay only for what you use #### Combo D: All-In on the Anthropic Ecosystem - **Only tool**: Claude Code Max 20x - **Pros**: No need to manage multiple tools — just focus on coding. Paired with the [Claude Code PRD Workflow](/posts/claude-code-prd-workflow), productivity is exceptional - **Risk**: Fully locked into Anthropic's ecosystem — vulnerable if policies change again - **Monthly cost**: $200/mo ### How to Choose: Decision Flowchart 1. **Are you comfortable in the terminal?** - Yes → Consider Claude Code or OpenCode - No → Consider Cursor or Windsurf 2. **Do you care about model freedom?** - Yes → OpenCode - No → Cursor or Claude Code 3. **What's your primary task?** - Frontend UI → Cursor - Large refactors → Claude Code - Mixed tasks → Combine tools 4. **Budget constraints?** - Free → OpenCode + local models - <$20/mo → Windsurf - $20-50/mo → Cursor or Claude Code Pro - Unlimited → Claude Code Max + Cursor (Combo A) --- ## 7. Risk Disclosure: Limitations of AI Coding Tools Before committing to any AI coding tool, you need to understand these risks. ### 1. AI Is Not Infallible Every AI coding tool hallucinates. Even with top SWE-bench scores, production code can contain bugs, security vulnerabilities, or logic errors. **Never blindly accept AI output** — code review remains essential. ### 2. Ecosystem Lock-In Risk - **Cursor**: A VS Code fork — if VS Code pivots or Cursor the company has issues, your extensions and settings can migrate back to VS Code - **Claude Code**: Entirely dependent on Anthropic. The crackdown already proved policies can change overnight - **Windsurf**: Custom IDE — if the company shuts down, migration costs are the highest - **OpenCode**: MIT License open-source — lowest risk. Even if the company disappears, the community can fork and maintain it ### 3. Runaway Cost Risk API pay-as-you-go pricing can spike under heavy usage. Particularly with Claude Code's API mode and OpenCode + commercial model combos — without usage caps, a runaway automation loop can burn through hundreds of dollars in hours. ### 4. Privacy and Compliance Your code is sent to AI company servers. For projects with strict compliance requirements (finance, healthcare, government), this may be a hard blocker. OpenCode + local models is the only fully offline option, but the performance gap is significant. ### 5. Skill Atrophy Over-reliance on AI coding tools can lead to fundamental programming skills deteriorating. Consider regular practice without AI assistance to maintain your manual debugging and design abilities. --- ## FAQ ### Q: I'm a beginner with budget for only one tool. Which should I pick? **Cursor.** It has the lowest learning curve (VS Code base), the most complete IDE integration, and the $20/month Pro plan covers everything you need. Once you're more comfortable with AI-assisted development, you can evaluate whether you need Claude Code's agentic capabilities. ### Q: Claude Code and OpenCode are both terminal tools. What's the difference? The biggest difference is **model lock-in vs model freedom**. Claude Code only works with Claude models, but as Anthropic's own product, it's the most optimized and highest-performing. OpenCode supports 75+ models with maximum flexibility, but performance depends on your chosen model, and it doesn't have Anthropic's deep optimization. ### Q: What exactly makes Windsurf's Cascade better than other tools? Cascade's core advantage is **persistent context understanding**. Other tools reload context with each new conversation (or require you to provide it manually) — Cascade remembers your previous actions in the project. The longer you work on the same project, the more pronounced this advantage becomes. ### Q: Will Anthropic crack down on more things? Nobody can predict for certain, but the trend suggests Anthropic is tightening its ecosystem. If you're heavily reliant on Claude models but don't want to be locked in, OpenCode + Claude API key is a compromise — you pay normal API fees, and Anthropic has no reason to block that. ### Q: Is OpenCode really free? Are there hidden costs? The OpenCode tool itself is MIT License, completely free. The hidden cost is **LLM API fees**. If you use Claude or GPT-4o, costs depend on usage volume. The only truly free setup is running local open-source models via Ollama (like CodeLlama or DeepSeek Coder), but there's a noticeable performance gap compared to commercial models. ### Q: Can these tools be used together? Will they conflict? Absolutely — no conflicts. Cursor and Windsurf operate at the IDE level, while Claude Code and OpenCode operate at the terminal level. They run independently. OpenCode even offers a Cursor extension, letting you use OpenCode inside Cursor. --- ## Conclusion: There's No Best Tool — Only the Best Combination In the 2026 AI coding tool landscape, each of the four contenders has a clear niche: - Want the **smoothest IDE experience** → Cursor - Want the **strongest AI autonomy** → Claude Code - Want the **cheapest complete solution** → Windsurf - Want the **most model freedom** → OpenCode But more importantly, the Anthropic crackdown taught us one thing: **don't put all your eggs in one basket.** The most pragmatic strategy is combining tools by scenario while ensuring you're familiar with at least one alternative. The AI tools ecosystem is still evolving rapidly — today's best choice might not work in six months. Staying flexible matters more than picking the "right" tool. **Next steps**: 1. Start with your biggest pain point and try one tool for a week 2. Read the [Claude Code Cost Guide](/posts/openclaw-claude-code-oauth-cost) to understand the cost structure 3. If you want to try an open-source option, check out the [OpenClaw Alternatives Guide](/posts/openclaw-alternatives-guide) --- ## OpenCode vs Anthropic Case: The Open vs Closed Debate Over AI Coding Tools in 2026 URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/opencode-anthropic-legal-controversy-2026 Date: 2026-02-20 Tools: OpenCode, Claude Code, OpenCode Zen, OpenCode Black Concepts: AI 編程工具, 開源 vs 封閉生態, vendor lock-in, OAuth 認證, 開發者工具選擇 ### Summary After hitting 100K GitHub stars, OpenCode had its Claude OAuth access revoked by Anthropic — triggering a significant open vs closed debate in AI coding tools. Full breakdown, community reactions, and developer strategies. ### Content # OpenCode vs Anthropic Case: The Open vs Closed Debate Over AI Coding Tools in 2026 At 2:20 AM UTC on January 9, 2026, Anthropic activated server-side protections, restricting third-party tools from accessing Claude models via OAuth. Over the following six weeks, Anthropic updated its requirements for projects like OpenCode, ultimately leading to the removal of all Claude OAuth code on February 19. This sequence of events — from technical blocking to updated documentation — targeted the fastest-growing open-source AI coding project on GitHub: OpenCode. This wasn't just a technical lockout. It reflected a core debate of 2026 in AI developer tools: should model companies get to dictate which tools developers use? When you're paying $200 a month, are you buying access to the model — or are you locked into a specific interface? This article reconstructs the full timeline, offers a balanced analysis of both sides, and provides actionable strategies you can use right now. ## TL;DR - OpenCode is the fastest-growing open-source AI coding tool of 2026 (100K+ GitHub stars, 2.5M monthly active developers), supporting 75+ model providers - Anthropic's existing ToS already prohibited non-API-Key automated access; after OpenCode spoofed Claude Code's HTTP headers, Anthropic activated technical blocking on January 9 and formally banned third-party OAuth via legal documentation on February 19, forcing OpenCode to remove its Claude OAuth code the same day - The community split: critics argued "you trained your models on our code, now you block open-source tools"; defenders said spoofing identity is a clear violation - OpenAI publicly sided with OpenCode, allowing Codex subscriptions for third-party tools — a deliberate strategic contrast - Best developer strategy: don't bet on a single provider — leverage multi-model switching to spread your risk ## What Is OpenCode? The Story Behind 18,000 Stars in Two Weeks Before we get into the controversy, let's be clear about what OpenCode actually is. OpenCode is an open-source AI coding agent built by Anomaly Innovations (formerly the SST / Serverless Stack team). Written in Go, it runs in the terminal using the Bubble Tea TUI framework. It launched in June 2025, MIT-licensed, fully open-source. Its core value proposition is straightforward: **model freedom**. Unlike Claude Code, which only works with Claude, OpenCode supports over 75 LLM providers — Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, AWS Bedrock, Groq, Ollama local models — virtually every provider you can think of. In other words, you're not locked in to any single model company. It's not limited to the terminal, either. Beyond the CLI TUI, OpenCode offers a Desktop App and extensions for VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains, Zed, Neovim, and Emacs — covering almost every mainstream development environment. The growth numbers speak for themselves: - Launched June 2025 → surpassed 100K GitHub stars by January 2026 - Gained 18,000 stars in two weeks in January 2026; the full jump from 39,800 to 71,900 took roughly a month - Peak single-day gain of 2,087 stars (January 12), briefly surpassing Claude Code's total star count - As of February 2026, monthly active developers reached 2.5 million This kind of growth isn't just about a good product. A significant catalyst was the controversy we're about to cover. ## The Full Story: Why Did Anthropic Lock Out OpenCode Overnight? ### Existing Policy and the Spoofing Technique One crucial fact to establish first: Anthropic's Consumer ToS (effective October 8, 2025) **already contained relevant restrictions**. Section 2 explicitly prohibits sharing account credentials, and Section 3.7 states that "except when accessing the Services via an Anthropic API Key or where Anthropic otherwise explicitly permits it," users are prohibited from accessing services through automated or non-human means. In other words, the January 9 blocking wasn't a new policy — it was **enforcement of existing terms**. Anthropic had always intended third-party services to use API Key billing, not subscription OAuth pass-through. With that context, early versions of OpenCode did something Anthropic found unacceptable: they spoofed the `claude-code-20250219` beta HTTP header, tricking Anthropic's servers into believing requests came from the official Claude Code CLI. This meant Anthropic subscribers (particularly those on the $200/month Max plan) could access Claude models through OpenCode while Anthropic's servers had no idea the requests weren't from their own product. ### The "Ralph Wiggum" Catalyst Things escalated rapidly after OpenCode v1.0 launched in December 2025. The community invented a technique called "Ralph Wiggum" — essentially stuffing Claude into a `while true` bash loop, letting it autonomously modify code over and over until all tests pass. How extreme did it get? One developer reportedly completed a $50,000 development contract for under $300 in API costs. Run it overnight, wake up to finished code. The problem: these infinite-loop agent sessions were all running on the $200/month "unlimited" Max subscription. The equivalent usage at API pay-per-use rates would easily exceed $1,000/month. Anthropic's infrastructure costs were surging while subscription revenue couldn't come close to covering them. ### Lockout Timeline | Date | Event | |------|-------| | October 8, 2025 | Anthropic Consumer ToS takes effect — Section 2 (no credential sharing) and Section 3.7 (no non-API-Key automated access) already cover the relevant restrictions | | Mid-2025 | OpenCode accesses Anthropic OAuth by spoofing Claude Code headers | | December 2025 | OpenCode v1.0 launches; "Ralph Wiggum" automation technique goes viral | | January 5, 2026 | GitHub Issue #6930 filed: OAuth usage violates Anthropic ToS | | January 9, 2026, 02:20 UTC | Anthropic deploys server-side protections, blocking all unofficial OAuth access (enforcing existing policy) | | January 9–10, 2026 | Thariq Shihipar acknowledges some accounts were incorrectly auto-banned by abuse filters; bans reversed | | January 15, 2026 | George Hotz publishes "Anthropic is making a huge mistake" | | Late January 2026 | OpenAI publicly supports OpenCode; OpenCode launches Black plan | | February 18, 2026 | Thariq posts: "Apologies, this was a docs clean up…nothing is changing" | | February 19, 2026 | Anthropic updates documentation with new "Authentication and credential use" section, formally prohibiting OAuth in third-party tools; same day, OpenCode commit `973715f` ("anthropic requests") removes all Claude OAuth code | ### Anthropic's Official Position After the January 9 incident, Anthropic's Thariq Shihipar stated that they had "tightened our safeguards against spoofing the Claude Code harness," explaining that unauthorized harnesses introduce bugs and usage patterns that Anthropic cannot properly diagnose. When third-party wrappers malfunction, users typically blame the model itself — directly undermining platform trust. Anthropic's core stance is that **this was not a new policy, but enforcement of existing terms**. On February 18, Thariq reiterated: "We haven't changed anything here," calling the February 19 documentation update "a docs clean up." However, he drew a clear line on usage: personal local development and experimentation are encouraged, but "if you're building a business on top of the Agent SDK, you should use an API key instead." On February 19, 2026, Anthropic updated its service terms with a new "Authentication and credential use" section explicitly stating: OAuth tokens from Free, Pro, and Max plans may not be used with third-party tools or the Agent SDK. Teams looking to integrate Claude must use API Key authentication with pay-per-use billing. The same day, OpenCode's Dax Raad (thdxr) committed `973715f`, removing all Claude OAuth code — including the spoofed `claude-code-20250219` header, the built-in Anthropic auth plugin, and an Anthropic-specific prompt file. ## Community Polarization: Who's Actually Right? What makes this controversy fascinating is that neither side is entirely wrong. ### The Critics Ruby on Rails creator DHH posted on X: "Terrible policy for a company built on training models on our code, our writing, our everything. Please change the terms, @DarioAmodei." This struck a nerve with many developers — Anthropic's models were trained on open-source code from the internet, yet the company now blocks open-source tools from accessing those models. George Hotz (geohot) was more blunt: he predicted the lockout wouldn't drive users back to Claude Code, but would instead "convert people to other model providers." AWS Hero AJ Stuyvenberg quipped that Anthropic was "speedrunning the transition from forgivable startup to despised corporation." GitHub Issue #6930 garnered 147+ reactions, and the Hacker News thread hit 245+ points. Multiple $200/month Max subscribers reported immediate downgrades or cancellations. The core argument is clear: I'm paying $200 a month — I should have the right to choose my preferred interface for the model I'm paying for. ### The Defenders But the other side deserves a hearing, too. Developer Artem K pointed out that Anthropic's response "is the gentlest it could've been — just a polite message instead of nuking your account or retroactively charging you at API prices." Compared to how other platforms handle ToS violations, Anthropic simply blocked access without banning accounts or issuing retroactive charges — a relatively restrained approach. The more fundamental issue: OpenCode was essentially impersonating another product. It spoofed Claude Code's identity to bypass authentication, which would be a violation on any platform. Anthropic has every right to protect its private API endpoints, just as any service provider would protect its authentication systems. And subscription pricing is built on the assumption of "reasonable usage." Infinite-loop agent workloads completely break the economic model — this isn't a use case Anthropic envisioned when designing its pricing. ### The Overlooked Middle Ground OpenCode was technically in violation, yes — but is Anthropic's walled-garden strategy actually smart from a business perspective? According to consumer chatbot traffic statistics, Claude's market share sits at just 1.07%. With market share already this small, pushing third-party tool users away raises a real question: is Anthropic protecting margins or accelerating churn? The answer may lie in how competitors responded. ## OpenAI's Strategic Countermove: The Open Alliance Takes Shape Within weeks of Anthropic's lockout, OpenAI made a telling move: it publicly "defected." OpenAI didn't just allow its Codex subscriptions to work in OpenCode — it extended the same support to OpenHands, RooCode, Pi, and other open-source tools. Starting with OpenCode v1.1.11+, users can natively connect their ChatGPT Plus/Pro subscriptions to use OpenAI models via the `/connect` command. Google Gemini similarly supports third-party integrations through its open API. An "open alliance" is forming, with Anthropic cast as the "closed" counterpart. This looks a lot like a recurring script in tech history: iOS vs Android. Apple chose a closed ecosystem with controlled experiences; Android chose openness and let the ecosystem evolve freely. Android ultimately captured over 70% of global market share. Of course, the AI model market and the smartphone market aren't perfectly comparable. Claude's benchmark performance in code generation (SWE-bench Verified 80.9% — still the highest single-model score) remains the strongest reason developers choose it. But as other models close the gap (GPT-5.2 at 80.0%, MiniMax M2.5 at 80.2%), the moat of model capability keeps getting shallower. When that moat narrows enough, ecosystem openness becomes the new deciding factor. And Anthropic's current strategy is losing ground on exactly that dimension. ## Developer Playbook: What Should You Do Right Now? Industry trends aside, let's get to the most practical question: how should you adjust your development workflow? ### Cost Comparison | Plan | Monthly Cost | Model Selection | Tool Freedom | Best For | |------|-------------|----------------|--------------|----------| | Claude Code (Max subscription) | $100–$200 | Claude only | Official CLI only | Heavy Claude users | | OpenCode + API Key | Pay-per-use | 75+ | Full freedom | Multi-model switching | | OpenCode Zen | From $20 top-up | Multi-model | Full freedom | Light users, cost-sensitive | | OpenCode Black | $20/$100/$200 | Multi-model (incl. Claude) | Full freedom | All-in-one solution | OpenCode Zen's pricing model is worth noting: it resells model access at cost (no markup), charging only the credit card processing fee (4.4% + $0.30). Starts at $20 top-up, auto-reloads when balance runs low, with no monthly lock-in. ### Decision Framework Choose based on your actual needs: - **You primarily rely on Claude Sonnet/Opus and don't want to manage other models** → Stay on Claude Code Max. It has the tightest integration, and Anthropic is continuously enhancing Claude Code's capabilities. - **You want the flexibility to switch between multiple models** → OpenCode + individual API keys. You can switch between Claude, GPT, and Gemini within the same tool based on the task. - **You're optimizing for the lowest possible cost** → OpenCode Zen pay-as-you-go. Pay only for the tokens you actually use. - **You want a Max-like "unlimited" experience while keeping tool freedom** → OpenCode Black $200/month plan, offering 20x base usage. ### Migration Notes The basic migration from Claude Code to OpenCode is straightforward: install → set up API Key → start using. But a few things to watch for: - **Custom instructions**: Claude Code's `CLAUDE.md` rules need to be manually ported to OpenCode's corresponding configuration - **MCP Server compatibility**: OpenCode supports MCP, but specific server integrations may differ in implementation - **Session history**: OpenCode uses local SQLite storage; Claude Code's history can't be directly migrated ## Risk Disclosure and Precautions Before making any decisions, be aware of these risks: **Model quality risk**: Claude still leads SWE-bench Verified at 80.9% (Claude Opus 4.5). Switching to other models may mean noticeable quality drops on certain tasks. That said, the gap is narrowing — GPT-5.2 (80.0%) and MiniMax M2.5 (80.2%) are extremely close. **ToS compliance risk**: OpenCode Black routes Claude access through an enterprise API gateway. While this technically uses the API (not OAuth), Anthropic could tighten policies further. Don't assume what works today will work forever. **Cost overrun risk**: API pay-per-use billing can spike dramatically with automated agents. If you're running "Ralph Wiggum"-style unattended loops, set daily/weekly usage caps. An agent loop without limits is the fastest way to burn money. **Open-source sustainability**: OpenCode is maintained by Anomaly Innovations with commercial revenue support, but long-term maintenance of any open-source project is never guaranteed. Watch its commit frequency, community activity, and business model health. **Data security**: OpenCode markets itself as privacy-first, storing session data in local SQLite. However, when using any third-party model provider, your code snippets are still sent to the provider's servers. If your project involves sensitive code, verify each provider's data handling policies. ## FAQ ### Is OpenCode free? The core tool is completely free, MIT-licensed. There's no additional charge for using your own API keys. The paid offerings are OpenCode Zen (pay-as-you-go model gateway, starting at $20 top-up) and OpenCode Black ($20/$100/$200 monthly plans). ### Can OpenCode still use Claude models after the lockout? Yes, but only via Anthropic API Keys (pay-per-use). The OAuth subscription pathway has been permanently blocked, and Anthropic's updated service terms from February 19, 2026 formally prohibit it. The OpenCode Black plan provides Claude access through an enterprise API gateway — using API billing rather than OAuth. ### Is OpenCode's coding performance worse than Claude Code? It depends on the model you use. Builder.io's benchmark shows Claude Code is faster (9 min 9 sec vs OpenCode's 16 min 20 sec), but OpenCode scored higher on test coverage (94 vs 73 tests). OpenCode itself is just the shell — actual performance depends on the underlying model. If you're running Claude Sonnet inside OpenCode, the model capability is theoretically identical. ### Will my Claude Max subscription be affected? If you only use the official Claude Code CLI and claude.ai, you're completely unaffected. However, if you previously used OAuth tokens through third-party tools like OpenCode, your account may have been flagged. Anthropic has stated it reserves the right to take enforcement action without prior notice. ### Is it hard to migrate from Claude Code to OpenCode? The basic migration is simple: install OpenCode → set up your API Key → start using it. But if you heavily rely on Claude Code's custom instructions (`CLAUDE.md`), MCP server integrations, or specific workflow automations, those need to be manually reconfigured. OpenCode has its own configuration system with slightly different syntax. ## Conclusion This controversy isn't just about one tool getting blocked. It reflects a fundamental question for the AI era: **who controls the developer toolchain?** Anthropic has reasonable business concerns — identity spoofing is a genuine violation, and unrestricted agent usage is genuinely expensive. But with OpenAI and Google embracing openness, the cost of a walled-garden strategy is rising. As the capability gap between models continues to shrink, ecosystem openness will become an increasingly important competitive dimension. For you, the most important takeaway is this: **don't let your workflow get locked in to any single provider.** Whether you currently use Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, or something else, maintain the flexibility to switch. Set up API keys with multiple providers so your toolchain won't collapse overnight because of any single company's policy change. This isn't a critique of Anthropic or any specific company. It's a basic strategy for protecting yourself in a fast-moving ecosystem. **Further Reading**: - What are the costs after the lockout? See [Claude Code Cost Guide: Choosing Between Pro/Max/API](/posts/openclaw-claude-code-oauth-cost) - Evaluating whether to self-host an AI Agent? Read [Should You Set Up OpenClaw? A Decision Guide](/posts/should-i-setup-an-openclaw) - Looking for safer alternatives? Check out [Self-Hosted AI Assistant Guide: OpenClaw vs NanoClaw vs Nanobot vs PicoClaw](/posts/openclaw-alternatives-guide) --- ## The Complete Guide to Making LINE Stickers with AI: Step-by-Step Process and the Truth About Earnings URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/ai-line-sticker-passive-income Date: 2026-02-19 Tools: ChatGPT, Midjourney, Canva, remove.bg Concepts: AI Image Generation, LINE Creators Market, Passive Income, Digital Creation ### Summary ChatGPT has made creating stickers effortless, but making money from them is a different story. This guide breaks down the revenue split, AI labeling policies, and the full publishing workflow so you can decide before you start. ### Content # The Complete Guide to Making LINE Stickers with AI: Step-by-Step Process and the Truth About Earnings ChatGPT can generate an adorable sticker character in seconds, and the process of publishing on LINE Creators Market isn't complicated either. "Make passive income with AI stickers" sounds great — but "being able to make them" and "being able to make money from them" are two very different things. Over 7.5 million creators are competing on this platform, your cut is only 35% of the sale price, and AI-generated stickers get automatically flagged by the platform. These are the things most tutorials won't tell you — and exactly what you need to know before you start. This guide doesn't just teach you how to make stickers. It helps you do the math on whether it's worth doing at all. ## TL;DR - ChatGPT / Midjourney can quickly generate sticker images, but there's still background removal, formatting, and sizing work between generation and publishing - LINE allows AI stickers, but they'll be **automatically labeled as AI-generated**, and infringing on existing IP is strictly prohibited - Creators take home roughly **35%** of the sale price (on a NT$30 / ~$1 USD sticker set, you get about NT$10.5 / ~$0.35) - Real earnings from a small creator: ~4,000 sets sold over 14 months ≈ NT$28,300 (~$900 USD) — far from "passive income" - Treat it as a "fun AI experiment" rather than an "income stream" and you'll have a much better experience ## Let's Look at the Numbers First — Can AI Stickers Really Generate Passive Income? Before spending time learning the tools, let's answer the most important question: how much can you actually earn selling LINE stickers? ### Revenue Split Breakdown The LINE sticker revenue split isn't as simple as "sell a set, keep the money." There are two layers of fees: 1. **Apple / Google takes 30% first** (for in-app purchases) 2. **LINE takes 50% of what's left** So for a sticker set priced at NT$30 (~$1 USD): ``` NT$30 (sale price) → Apple/Google takes 30% = NT$21 remaining → LINE takes 50% = NT$10.5 remaining → You actually receive: NT$10.5 (~$0.35 USD, roughly 35% of the sale price) ``` > **Note**: If a buyer purchases through the LINE STORE website (not in-app), the Apple/Google cut doesn't apply, so the split is better. But the vast majority of purchases happen in-app. ### Earnings Projection Table | Sets Sold | NT$30 × 35% | Your Earnings | |-----------|-------------|---------------| | 100 sets | NT$10.5 × 100 | NT$1,050 (~$33 USD) | | 500 sets | NT$10.5 × 500 | NT$5,250 (~$165 USD) | | 1,000 sets | NT$10.5 × 1,000 | NT$10,500 (~$330 USD) | | 5,000 sets | NT$10.5 × 5,000 | NT$52,500 (~$1,650 USD) | Real-world case: A Taiwanese creator shared that over 14 months, they sold about 4,000 sets and actually received NT$28,300 (~$900 USD). What does that mean? An average monthly income of about NT$2,021 (~$63 USD) — roughly the cost of a nice dinner. ### Market Reality - **Over 7.5 million** registered creators globally (LINE Creators Market 10th anniversary data, 2024) - **Over 1 million** creators in Taiwan alone - Only **198 creators** worldwide have achieved cumulative sales exceeding 100 million JPY (LINE 8th anniversary data, 2022) - Revenue is extremely concentrated at the top; the vast majority of creators earn close to zero > **Practical advice**: If your motivation is "passive income," LINE stickers will almost certainly fall short of your expectations. But if your motivation is "having fun, learning AI tools, and maybe earning a little pocket money," then it's absolutely worth trying. Your mindset determines your experience. ## The 5-Step Workflow — From AI Image Generation to LINE Publication ### Step 1: Character Design and Prompt Engineering The biggest challenge with AI stickers isn't "generating one image" — it's "generating 8-40 images with a consistent style." **ChatGPT (GPT-4o) — Best for Beginners** GPT-4o supports generating transparent-background PNGs directly, and its conversational interface lets you iteratively refine your character. In practice, its biggest advantage is character consistency: when generating the same character with different expressions within a single conversation, GPT-4o is noticeably more stable than Midjourney, saving beginners significant time on revisions. Prompt example: ``` 請幫我設計一個 LINE 貼圖角色:一隻穿著西裝的柴犬上班族。 風格:簡約手繪線條、Q版、白色背景。 請生成以下 8 個表情動作,保持角色外觀一致: 1. 開心打招呼 2. 加油打氣 3. 累到趴在桌上 4. 驚訝 5. 比讚 6. 生氣(可愛版) 7. 哭哭 8. 說謝謝 每張圖透明背景,正方形比例。 ``` **Midjourney — For Unique Visual Styles** Superior image quality and style variety compared to ChatGPT, but character consistency is a real weakness. You'll need the `--cref` (character reference) parameter to maintain consistency, and the learning curve is steeper. **Free Alternatives** If you just want to test the waters: Microsoft Designer (free) and Adobe Firefly (with free credits) can both generate decent sticker-style images, but they're weaker on character consistency and background control. ### Step 2: Background Removal and Image Processing LINE stickers require **PNG format with transparent backgrounds**. Even when you specify a transparent background in your prompt, AI-generated images sometimes still have faint background residue. **Recommended Free Background Removal Tools** - **Canva** (free tier): Built-in background removal, intuitive interface, great for batch processing - **remove.bg**: One-click removal with excellent results, but the free version only allows low-resolution downloads (625x400px) — high quality requires a paid plan - **PhotoRoom**: Mobile app, great for quick background removal on the go > **Tip**: If you're using ChatGPT GPT-4o, you can request "transparent background, sticker style" directly in your prompt. In most cases, you'll get a transparent-background PNG right away, skipping the removal step entirely. ### Step 3: Layout and Sizing LINE stickers have strict size requirements: | Asset | Dimensions | Notes | |-------|-----------|-------| | Main Image | 240 × 240 px | The representative image in the sticker shop | | Sticker | Max 370 × 320 px | Width and height must be even numbers; leave 10px transparent margin on all sides | | Tab Image | 96 × 74 px | The small icon shown in the chat sticker selector | **How Many Stickers to Include** You can choose 8, 16, 24, 32, or 40 stickers (must be a multiple of 8). Beginners should start with **8** — it's the lowest barrier and lets you validate the process quickly. You can always add more or release a sequel based on feedback. Use **Canva** or **Figma** to create templates at the required dimensions, place your background-removed images, verify margins, and export as PNG. ### Step 4: Publishing on LINE Creators Market 1. **Register**: Go to [LINE Creators Market](https://creator.line.me/) and log in with your LINE account — registration is free 2. **Create new sticker set**: Click "New Submission" → "Stickers," then upload your main image, tab image, and all sticker images 3. **Fill in the details**: - Sticker set title (include English, plus local languages for your target markets) - Description text - Tags — this is critical for SEO and directly affects search visibility 4. **AI usage declaration**: If you used AI tools, **you must check the "Uses AI" option**. LINE will automatically display an AI label on the purchase page 5. **Select sales regions and pricing**: Minimum NT$30 (~$1 USD) 6. **Submit for review** ### Step 5: Review and Handling Rejections Review typically takes a few hours to 2 days. Common rejection reasons: - **Poor image quality**: Blurry images, rough edges, background not cleanly removed - **Repetitive content**: The 8 stickers have overly similar compositions or expressions - **Sensitive content**: Violence, discrimination, or politically charged elements - **Copyright concerns**: Characters too similar to well-known IP Don't panic if you get rejected — just fix the issues and resubmit. LINE will tell you the specific reason for rejection. ## AI Sticker Tool Comparison | Tool | Strengths | Weaknesses | Best For | Monthly Cost | |------|-----------|------------|----------|-------------| | ChatGPT (GPT-4o) | Conversational workflow, strong character consistency, transparent backgrounds | Fewer style options | Beginners, fast production | $20 | | Midjourney | Diverse styles, high image quality | Poor character consistency, steeper learning curve | Unique visual aesthetics | From $10 | | Microsoft Designer | Free, easy to use | Inconsistent quality, weak consistency | Testing the waters at zero cost | Free | | Adobe Firefly | Commercially safe (trained on licensed data) | Limited free credits | Creators concerned about copyright risk | Free/Paid | > **Practical choice**: If you already have a ChatGPT Plus subscription, just use GPT-4o — no need to spend extra. It's the most beginner-friendly option for character consistency and ease of use. ## Strategies to Improve Your Odds Standing out among 7.5 million creators isn't easy, but there are ways to boost your visibility: **1. Pick the Right Niche** Avoid saturated categories like "cute cats" and "cute dogs." Try instead: - Workplace humor ("Inner thoughts during meetings," "Countdown to quitting time") - Cultural and regional humor (local slang, holiday-specific stickers) - Community-specific language (developer humor, healthcare worker memes, teacher life) - Couple / relationship daily life (an evergreen market) **2. Title and Tag SEO** Your sticker title and tags directly affect search results. Research trending search terms in the LINE sticker shop and naturally incorporate keywords into your title and tags. **3. Volume Strategy** A single set of 8 stickers is unlikely to go viral. A more realistic approach: release multiple sets featuring the same character ("Shiba Office Worker Vol.1," "Vol.2"...) to build character recognition. AI tools make the marginal cost of each new set extremely low. **4. Social Media Promotion** Don't just publish and wait. Share your stickers and the creation process on Instagram, Threads, Twitter/X, Reddit, and other platforms. "Stickers made with AI" is inherently shareable content with built-in novelty. ## Risk Disclosure and Important Considerations ### The AI Label Effect LINE automatically displays an AI label on the purchase page of AI-generated stickers, and LINE reserves the right to determine whether content is AI-generated on its own. While there's no public data on exactly how the AI label affects sales, consumers may be less inclined to buy — especially when there's an abundance of "hand-drawn feel" stickers to choose from. ### Copyright and Intellectual Property Risks LINE's review guidelines explicitly prohibit infringing on third-party intellectual property, including the use of cartoon characters, celebrity likenesses, brand trademarks, and other protected elements. When using AI to generate images, avoid prompts like "Ghibli style" or "Disney character" that may produce infringing content. Additionally, images generated purely from AI prompts are currently not protected by copyright in the United States. This means your stickers could theoretically be copied by others with no legal recourse. If you make substantial creative modifications to the images (such as recoloring or adding hand-drawn elements), you may be able to claim protection. Legal positions vary by country and are still evolving. ### Sunk Cost Risk - ChatGPT Plus costs $20/month - Time invested in creation and promotion each month - Expected income may be zero If you spend 3 months, invest $60 in tool costs and dozens of hours, yet only earn $15 in revenue, that's a losing investment. Be honest with yourself before you start: are you doing this for fun, or for money? ### Extreme Market Saturation 7.5 million creators competing for limited attention. New sticker sets get a very brief window of exposure after launch, and without external promotion, they're virtually impossible to discover organically. LINE's search and recommendation algorithms heavily favor popular stickers that already have sales momentum. ### Platform Policy Changes LINE can adjust its AI sticker policies, revenue splits, or review standards at any time. Starting February 2015, LINE stopped absorbing the Apple/Google 30% platform fee on behalf of creators, dropping the creator's effective share from 50% to roughly 35% of the sale price. Platform rules can change without warning — putting all your eggs in one basket is inherently risky. ## FAQ **Q1: Does it cost money to publish AI stickers on LINE?** A: No. Registration and publishing on LINE Creators Market are completely free — all you need is a LINE account. The only cost is the AI tool you use (e.g., ChatGPT Plus at $20/month), but there are free alternatives you can use to try it at zero cost. **Q2: How long does it take to make and publish a sticker set?** A: Once you're familiar with the workflow, about 2-4 hours for a set of 8 stickers (including image generation, background removal, formatting, and submission). Your first attempt may take an entire afternoon since you'll be learning the process and iterating on prompts. Review typically takes a few hours to 2 days. **Q3: Can I use AI stickers on platforms other than LINE?** A: The images you generate can be freely reused, but the sticker format uploaded to LINE Creators Market is LINE-specific. If you want to also publish on WhatsApp Stickers or Telegram Stickers, you'll need to handle the formatting and submission process separately for each platform. **Q4: Do I need to know Chinese or Japanese to sell stickers?** A: Not at all. LINE Creators Market supports English, and you can fill in sticker names and descriptions in English. That said, adding Japanese or Chinese titles is recommended since LINE's biggest sticker markets are Japan, Taiwan, and Thailand — multilingual listings can significantly expand your reach. **Q5: Do I need to pay taxes on LINE sticker income?** A: Yes. In most countries, sticker income is considered taxable income and should be reported accordingly. However, given that most small creators earn very little, the actual tax impact is usually minimal. Keep your LINE payment records for documentation. Note that you need to accumulate at least JPY 1,000 (~$7 USD) before you can request a payout. ## Conclusion AI has reduced the barrier to "making stickers" to nearly zero — ChatGPT can generate a character in seconds, and a full set of 8 stickers can be done in two to three hours. But the barrier to "making money from stickers" remains high: 7.5 million creators, a 35% revenue share, and the potential impact of the AI label — these realities don't disappear just because the tools got easier. If your goal is "have fun + learn AI image generation + maybe earn a little pocket money," this is a great weekend project. Along the way, you'll pick up skills in prompt engineering, image processing, and platform publishing — and that experience has value in itself. If your goal is "stable passive income," you need much more realistic expectations — or you'd be better off investing your time in a side project with a higher return on effort. Go ahead and make your first set of 8 stickers. Validate at the lowest possible cost whether you actually enjoy the process — because with earnings this modest, "enjoying the process" is the only reason you'll stick with it. --- ## AI-Era PM Skill Upgrade Roadmap — From 'Using ChatGPT' to Systematic AI Competency URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/ai-pm-skill-roadmap-2026 Date: 2026-02-19 Tools: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, Claude Code, NotebookLM, Zapier Concepts: AI PM, 技能路線圖, Prompt Engineering, AI 工作流, 機率性思維, 職涯轉型 ### Summary 98% of PMs use AI, but only 39% have received systematic training. This dual-track roadmap helps you upgrade your AI skills from 'start today' to '12 months out,' covering both enhancing your current role and transitioning into AI product management. ### Content # AI-Era PM Skill Upgrade Roadmap — From "Using ChatGPT" to Systematic AI Competency You use AI every day to write PRDs, summarize meetings, and run competitive analyses — but let's be honest, does that mean you actually "know AI"? According to a 2025 General Assembly survey, 98% of PMs already use AI at work, yet only 39% have received systematic AI training. As AI takes over more of the tasks that define PM work, where does your irreplaceability lie? This article offers a dual-track roadmap: whether you want to supercharge your current role with AI or transition into AI product management, you'll find a concrete action plan from "what you can do today" to "where you'll be in 12 months." ## TL;DR - **Using AI ≠ understanding AI.** 98% of PMs use it, but only 39% have systematic training — that gap is your upgrade opportunity - **Two tracks to choose from:** Track A "AI-Enhanced PM" boosts your current workflow; Track B "AI-Native PM" transitions you into managing AI products - **60% of AI PMs come from non-technical backgrounds** — the real barrier is judgment, not coding - Each phase pairs specific tools with hands-on exercises — not vague advice to "go learn AI" ## The Current State — How Big Is the PM AI Skills Gap? Let's start with the numbers: according to a General Assembly survey of 117 PMs (across the US, UK, Canada, and Singapore), **98% of PMs use AI at work, averaging 11 times per day**, with the top 10% using it up to 25 times daily. Productboard's report echoes this trend — 100% of surveyed product teams use AI tools, with 94% using them daily. But usage doesn't equal competence. **Only 39% of PMs have received systematic, job-specific AI training** — another 19% received only generic training, and 19% covered just the basics. Even more alarming: **66% of PMs admit to using unapproved shadow AI tools** — meaning most people are using AI in the wild, without systematic methodology or organizational support. You might use Claude to write PRDs every day, but can you explain the principles behind prompt engineering when asked? You might use AI for competitive analysis, but can you tell which outputs are hallucinations and which are reliable? Here's the real issue: **AI can generate PRDs, analyze data, and create presentations — when all of this can be automated, what's left of a PM's core value?** The answer isn't panic. According to the General Assembly survey, 26% of PMs worry about eventually being replaced, but from what I've observed, the real risk isn't "AI replacing PMs" — it's **PMs who use AI well replacing those who don't**. The same survey shows that 75% of PMs using AI can focus more on strategic work, and 40% report working fewer hours. AI isn't here to steal your job; it's here to force you to level up. ## The Dual-Track Roadmap — First, Figure Out Which Path You're Taking Before learning any new skill, answer one question: **Do you want to use AI to excel at your current PM job, or do you want to transition into managing AI products?** These two paths require fundamentally different skill sets. I break them into two tracks: ### Track A: AI-Enhanced PM (Using AI to Supercharge Your Current Role) - **Who it's for:** PMs who enjoy their current role and want to boost efficiency and output quality - **Core skills:** Prompt Engineering, AI workflow design, data literacy, AI-assisted decision making - **Goal:** Use AI to become a "one-person product team," redirecting saved time toward higher-value strategic thinking ### Track B: AI-Native PM (Managing AI Products) - **Who it's for:** PMs looking to transition to AI product lines, or those at companies developing AI features - **Core skills:** ML fundamentals, probabilistic thinking, AI ethics and safety, model evaluation - **Goal:** Hold your own in conversations with ML engineers and define success metrics for AI features ### Side-by-Side Comparison | Dimension | Track A: AI-Enhanced | Track B: AI-Native | |-----------|---------------------|-------------------| | Prerequisites | Any software PM can start | Requires willingness to learn technical basics | | Learning curve | Results in 1-3 months | 6-12 months | | Salary impact | +20-30% competitiveness on current salary | AI PM median base salary ~$200K (US market) | | Risk | Low (incremental improvement) | Medium (requires transition investment) | > **Salary note:** According to Axial Search's analysis of 592 AI PM job postings, the median US AI PM base salary is approximately $200,500. In Taiwan, Yourator's 2025 survey indicates entry-level AI PM salaries of TWD 800K-1.2M, mid-level at TWD 1.2M-2M, and senior at TWD 2.5M+. ### How to Choose? - If you're **satisfied with your current role + want immediate results** → Track A - If you're **interested in AI products + willing to invest 6+ months** → Track B - If you're **unsure** → Start with Track A for 3 months, build your AI intuition, then decide The two tracks aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, starting with Track A is the best warm-up for Track B — your hands-on experience using AI on the front lines becomes the most valuable intuition when managing AI products. ## Track A Skill Tree — 3 Phases from "User" to "Architect" ### Phase 1: AI User (Month 1-2) The goal here is simple: **go from "casual usage" to "methodical usage."** **Core skills:** - Structured Prompt Writing (role setting, task decomposition, output format control) - Multi-model comparison mindset (ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini each excel at different things) - AI output quality judgment (identifying hallucinations, assessing completeness, cross-validation) **Tools:** ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini **Hands-on exercise:** Take a requirement you're currently working on, feed it to all three models, compare the outputs, and document your judgment criteria. The point isn't "which model is better" — it's training your intuition for evaluating AI output quality. From my experience, the biggest reason PMs get stuck at this phase is relying on just one model — it's like making decisions based on a single person's competitive analysis. ### Phase 2: AI Workflow Designer (Month 3-6) Level up from "using AI for individual tasks" to "designing AI-driven workflows." **Core skills:** - AI workflow chaining (multi-step task automation) - Prompt templatization (building a reusable prompt library) - AI + existing tool integration (Jira, Notion, Confluence, Slack) **Tools:** Claude Code / Cursor, MCP (Model Context Protocol), Zapier AI **Hands-on exercise:** Fully automate a recurring weekly task with AI. For example, Sprint Review summaries — pull completed stories from Jira, generate a summary with AI, auto-format, and post to Slack. This kind of task might have taken you 2 hours before; automated, it takes 5 minutes. For a concrete example of PM workflow transformation, check out [this hands-on guide to Claude-powered PM workflows](/posts/pm-workflow-revolution-claude). ### Phase 3: AI Collaboration Architect (Month 6-12) Level up from "personal AI usage" to "designing AI collaboration systems for your team." **Core skills:** - Sub-agent design (decomposing complex tasks for multiple AIs to handle) - RAG concept application (giving AI access to your team's knowledge base) - Team AI SOP development (standardizing AI usage to reduce shadow AI risk) **Tools:** Claude Skills / Custom GPTs, NotebookLM, internal knowledge base + AI integration **Hands-on exercise:** Design an "AI-assisted requirements review" process for your team — before each review, AI pre-screens requirements against historical data and existing documentation, flags potential risks, and generates a review question checklist. Run it for 2 Sprints, then iterate based on team feedback. At this stage, your value goes beyond "knowing how to use AI" — you're the person who can **design how AI and humans collaborate**. That's the scarcest capability right now. ## Track B Skill Tree — Transitioning from Software PM to AI PM ### Foundation Building (Month 1-3) **Core skills:** - ML fundamentals (supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement learning — you don't need to code them, but you need to explain them) - Data pipeline concepts (where data comes from, how it's cleaned, how it's labeled) - Model evaluation metrics (Precision, Recall, F1 Score — knowing when to focus on which) **Recommended resources:** Andrew Ng's Machine Learning course (free to audit, certificate requires payment), Google ML Crash Course **The goal at this stage** isn't to turn you into an ML engineer — it's to let you read engineers' technical documents and ask meaningful questions in meetings. For example, when an engineer says "model accuracy is 95%," you should be able to ask: "On what dataset? What's the recall for minority classes?" ### Product Thinking Transformation (Month 3-6) **Core skills:** - Probabilistic thinking: shifting from "this feature will definitely do X" to "this feature has a 95% chance of doing X, with a 5% failure rate" - AI product spec writing: including edge case handling, fallback strategies, confidence score thresholds - Bias and fairness assessment: does your AI feature perform consistently across different user groups? **Hands-on exercise:** Take a traditional feature spec you currently own and rewrite it as an AI feature spec. For example, turn "search functionality" into "AI-recommended search" — you'll discover a whole set of things traditional specs never need to define: What counts as a "good recommendation"? How do you handle cold starts? How do you monitor recommendation bias? This mindset shift is the hardest part. Traditional software PMs are used to determinism — press a button, get a guaranteed action. AI products are different; you need to learn to make product decisions under uncertainty. From my experience working on AI feature development, the most common sticking point is PMs who can't accept that "the model can never be 100% correct," repeatedly asking engineers to fix it to zero errors. Once you redefine "success" with probabilistic thinking — say, "95% accuracy + graceful fallback" — collaboration efficiency with your engineering team skyrockets. ### Advanced Integration (Month 6-12) **Core skills:** - AI ethics framework (privacy, transparency, explainability) - Cost-benefit analysis (API call costs vs. self-hosted models vs. open-source trade-offs) - AI product Go-to-Market (how do you explain to customers that "AI is sometimes wrong"?) **Goal:** Independently own an AI feature from 0 to 1 — from problem definition, data strategy, model selection, to post-launch monitoring and iteration. According to Aakash Gupta's analysis, AI PM job postings doubled in 2025, with over 12,000 new roles globally. The Taiwan market follows suit, with companies like TSMC and MediaTek actively hiring AI PMs. If you're ready, the opportunities are real. ## You Don't Need a CS Degree — Breaking the Technical Barrier Myth "I'm not from an engineering background — is this even worth learning?" This is probably the concern I hear most often. The data gives a clear answer: according to Aakash Gupta's analysis of 18,000+ AI PMs, **60% of AI PMs come from non-technical backgrounds** — 34% from design, psychology, and liberal arts, and 18% from business management. This doesn't mean technical skills are unimportant — it means the core of a PM's AI competitiveness is **judgment**, not coding ability: - **Judging which problems are worth solving with AI:** Not everything needs AI; identifying high-ROI AI use cases is a PM's core value - **Judging whether AI output quality meets the bar:** Knowing when to trust and when to question AI's output - **Judging whether an AI solution's ROI makes sense:** Weighing API costs, maintenance overhead, and user experience gains The real technical floor isn't "building models" — it's "asking the right questions" and "evaluating the answers." If you can do the core PM job well — understanding user needs, defining problems, measuring outcomes — you already have 80% of an AI PM's core competencies. The remaining 20% is domain knowledge you can fill in over 3-6 months. ## Risk Disclosure Every roadmap comes with risks. Being honest about them leads to better decisions: - **Over-reliance risk:** AI output requires human judgment as a safeguard. From experience, blindly trusting AI output without verification will eventually backfire in a critical situation — especially for data analysis and customer insight tasks - **Shadow AI compliance risk:** 66% of PMs use unapproved AI tools, making confidential data leaks a real threat. Before processing company data with any AI tool, confirm your company's AI usage policy - **Skills bubble:** "Knowing how to use AI tools" ≠ "understanding AI." ChatGPT's interface might look completely different next year, but structured thinking and judgment don't expire. Invest in mental frameworks, not tool-specific tricks - **Career investment risk:** Track B requires 6-12 months of dedicated effort, which may impact current job performance. I recommend using 20% of your time for exploration without compromising core KPIs - **Data currency:** The survey data cited in this article is from 2025. The AI field moves fast — reassess your skill development plan every 6 months ## FAQ **Q: I can't code at all. Can I still take Track B?** Yes, but I'd recommend starting with Track A for 3 months to build your AI intuition first. As noted above, 60% of AI PMs come from non-technical backgrounds, but foundational data literacy and logical thinking are essential. If you can work with Excel VLOOKUP and pivot tables, your starting point is already sufficient. **Q: My company has no AI product line. Is this still useful?** Track A is immediately valuable for any software PM. Even without AI products, using AI to boost your personal productivity makes you stand out on performance reviews. According to Productboard's report, PMs save an average of 4 hours per task using AI — that's tangible productivity improvement any company can see. **Q: How quickly will these skills become obsolete?** Specific tools (particular versions of ChatGPT, Claude) might undergo major changes every six months, but the underlying capabilities — structured thinking, AI output judgment, workflow design — remain effective long-term. Reassess your tool stack quarterly, but you won't need to relearn the core frameworks. **Q: How do I convince my manager to support my AI learning?** Lead with data: PMs save an average of 4 hours per task using AI. I'd suggest completing Track A Phase 1 on your own first, producing concrete results (like an automated Sprint Review workflow), then presenting those results when proposing a systematic learning plan. Showing results first, then asking for resources, is far more persuasive than the other way around. ## Conclusion In the AI era, a PM's core value isn't about "whether you can use AI tools" — it's about "whether you can design how AI and humans work together." Tools change, models iterate, but your judgment and workflow design capabilities only become more valuable over time. The dual-track roadmap lets you choose a path based on your career goals, but regardless of which track you pick, **you can start today**: Take a requirement you're currently working on, run it through three different AI models, and document your judgment on each output — what's good, what's problematic, what you'd change. This exercise seems simple, but it trains the most essential capability for PMs in the AI era: **judgment on AI output**. That's where the upgrade begins. --- ## AI Presentation Tools Comparison 2026: Gamma, Beautiful.ai, Canva, NotebookLM, and Copilot Reviewed URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/ai-presentation-tools-comparison Date: 2026-02-19 Tools: Gamma, Beautiful.ai, Canva, NotebookLM, Microsoft Copilot Concepts: AI 簡報, 生產力工具, 工具比較 ### Summary We tested five AI presentation tools with identical source material, scoring each across output quality, editing effort, export fidelity, and multilingual support — so you can pick the right one fast. ### Content # AI Presentation Tools Comparison 2026: Gamma, Beautiful.ai, Canva, NotebookLM, and Copilot Reviewed Making presentations every week, but every AI tool sounds the same on paper? I ran the same 500-word Q4 operations report through five leading AI presentation tools and scored each one across four dimensions: output quality, editing effort, export fidelity, and multilingual support. This review saves you the time of testing each tool yourself and tells you directly which one fits your use case. > **Note:** This review was originally conducted with a focus on Traditional Chinese language support. The multilingual support scores and commentary reflect those findings, but the patterns generally apply to any non-English language workflow. ## TL;DR - **Gamma**: Best for getting a solid draft fast, but PPT export has layout issues — better for online sharing than formal meetings - **Beautiful.ai**: Highest design quality, but no free plan and weak non-English language support — best for English-first teams - **Canva AI**: Most complete ecosystem, ideal if you already use Canva, but AI output tends to be outline-level - **NotebookLM**: Completely free with high content accuracy, but export is primarily PDF and editing is limited - **Copilot + PowerPoint**: The natural choice for enterprise users, but output is outline-style and requires an additional subscription ## Why You Need to Re-evaluate Your AI Presentation Tool Right Now If your knowledge of AI presentation tools is still stuck in 2024, you're already behind. **Tome is dead.** Once synonymous with AI presentations and boasting over 20 million users, Tome announced the shutdown of its presentation feature in March 2025, with Tome Slides officially closing on April 30. The founding team has pivoted to an AI-native CRM called Lightfield. Yet a large number of recommendation articles still list Tome — those articles are now completely invalid. **NotebookLM has emerged as a free dark horse.** Google added presentation generation to NotebookLM in November 2025. It's completely free, generates slides from your own source documents, and delivers content accuracy that far surpasses the generic AI generation of other tools. **The market is exploding.** The AI presentation generation market is projected to grow from $1.94 billion in 2025 to $4.79 billion in 2029 (CAGR 25.4%). Tools iterate every quarter, which means a review from six months ago is already outdated. This is why you need a controlled, hands-on test based on the latest versions. ## Testing Methodology: How We Compared Five Tools Fairly To make the comparison as fair as possible, I designed the following testing protocol: **Standardized source material**: A roughly 500-word product Q4 operations report summary containing revenue figures, key metrics, team achievements, and next-quarter plans. This topic was chosen because it closely mirrors the everyday presentation needs of most knowledge workers. **Unified prompt**: "Based on the following content, create a 10-slide presentation in a professional and clean style, including data visualizations." **Four scoring dimensions** (1–5 points each): | Dimension | What We Evaluated | |-----------|-------------------| | Output Quality | Layout design, content structure, and visual professionalism | | Editing Effort | How much manual adjustment is needed after AI generation | | Export Fidelity | Layout accuracy and format compatibility after PPT/PDF export | | Multilingual Support | Font rendering, line-breaking, and non-English language comprehension | ## Test Results at a Glance ### Overall Score Comparison | Tool | Output Quality | Editing Effort | Export Fidelity | Multilingual Support | Total | |------|---------------|----------------|-----------------|----------------------|-------| | **Gamma** | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 13/20 | | **Beautiful.ai** | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 15/20 | | **Canva AI** | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 14/20 | | **NotebookLM** | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 12/20 | | **Copilot + PPT** | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 14/20 | > **Important caveat**: Scores reflect the out-of-the-box experience. Every tool can produce solid results with enough time invested — the difference is how much time you need to put in. ### Gamma — The AI-Native Contender Gamma is currently the most widely used AI presentation tool, surpassing 70 million users and $100M ARR as of November 2025. **Test performance**: Gamma's strength is structural reasoning. Feed it source material and it automatically breaks the content into a logical section hierarchy, then generates matching charts and visual elements. Slides look great inside the Gamma platform — animations are smooth and layouts are clean. **Multilingual support**: Gamma ranks among the top performers here. It handles non-English content well, demonstrating strong semantic understanding and clean line-breaking for CJK languages in particular. **Biggest pain point**: PPT export is a serious problem. In testing, charts shifted position, fonts were substituted, and animations disappeared. If your final deliverable is a PPTX file, you will spend significant time fixing the output. The free tier also only provides 400 AI credits — once they're gone, they're gone. **Best for**: Online sharing, internal communication, and any scenario where you don't need to export a PPT file. Gamma's shareable web link experience is far superior to its exported files. ### Beautiful.ai — The Design Quality Champion Beautiful.ai's core technology is Smart Slides — you input content, and the system handles layout automatically. **Test performance**: Design sophistication is the highest of the five tools. Proportions, color pairings, and typographic hierarchy are all polished, requiring almost no manual design adjustments. PPT export fidelity is also comparatively strong. **Multilingual support**: This is Beautiful.ai's most significant weakness. Font options for non-Latin scripts are extremely limited, parts of the interface remain English-only, and AI-generated non-English content occasionally mixes character sets incorrectly. If your presentations are primarily in English, this is a non-issue. For non-English workflows, it becomes a recurring frustration. **Pricing barrier**: Beautiful.ai has no free plan — only a 14-day trial. Pro is $12/month (billed annually); Team is $40/month (billed annually). **Best for**: English-first presentations, teams that prioritize design quality, and professionals willing to pay for a polished tool. ### Canva AI — The Ecosystem Play Canva's AI presentation feature is part of the broader Canva ecosystem — which is both its greatest strength and its biggest constraint. **Test performance**: AI-generated output tends to be outline-level. It builds structure and populates basic text, but visual elements are sparse. The real value is that you can immediately pull from Canva's massive template library, image library, and design elements to fill things in. If you're already comfortable in Canva, this workflow is genuinely smooth. **Multilingual support**: Canva performs well here, offering extensive font options and a fully localized interface across many languages. **Pricing**: The free plan includes AI features with limited usage (approximately 50 uses/month). Pro is $15/month with usage increased to roughly 500 AI uses/month. **Best for**: Users already invested in the Canva ecosystem, projects that require diverse design assets, and teams that value template variety. ### NotebookLM — The Free Dark Horse NotebookLM's presentation feature was one of the surprises of late 2025. Its underlying logic is fundamentally different from the other tools: rather than generating from a prompt, it generates from documents you upload. **Test performance**: Because output is grounded in actual source material, content accuracy is noticeably higher than other tools. There's no risk of AI hallucinating figures or fabricating data points. The visual design is functional but unremarkable — not impressive, but usable. **Multilingual support**: Backed by Google's multilingual capabilities, NotebookLM performs well across non-English languages. **Key limitations**: Export is currently primarily PDF (Google is rolling out PPTX export starting in February 2026). Editing has improved — the Revise feature lets you modify individual slides via AI instructions — but it still lacks the free-form drag-and-edit control of traditional presentation software. The free tier allows up to 10 presentations per day. **Best for**: Internal reports, study group summaries, teaching materials, and any scenario where content accuracy matters more than visual polish. ### Copilot + PowerPoint — The Enterprise Integration Choice If your organization already has Microsoft 365 licenses, Copilot is the path of least resistance. **Test performance**: Copilot-generated presentations are outline-heavy and light on visual elements — think "a solid starting draft" rather than a finished deck. The key advantage is that everything happens natively inside PowerPoint, so export issues simply don't exist. **Multilingual support**: Moderate. PowerPoint itself handles non-English languages without issue, but Copilot-generated content in non-English languages occasionally produces phrasing that feels slightly unnatural. **Pricing**: Copilot requires an additional $30/user/month subscription (billed annually) on top of a base Microsoft 365 plan. This is expensive for individual users, but if an organization already has M365 licenses, the incremental cost is more reasonable. **Best for**: Organizations with existing Microsoft 365 licenses, workflows that require native PPTX output, and teams looking to layer AI onto an existing toolchain. ## Pricing and Plans Compared | Tool | Free Plan | Personal Plan | Team Plan | Hidden Limits | |------|-----------|---------------|-----------|---------------| | Gamma | 400 AI credits (one-time) | Plus $8/mo | Pro $18/mo | Watermark on free tier | | Beautiful.ai | 14-day trial only | Pro $12/mo (annual) | Team $40/mo (annual) | No permanent free plan | | Canva AI | Yes (~50 uses/mo) | Pro $15/mo | Teams $10/user/mo | AI usage capped on free | | NotebookLM | Free (10 decks/day) | Plus $19.99/mo | — | Export format limitations | | Copilot + PPT | None | ~$30/mo (incl. M365) | Enterprise licensing | Requires separate M365 base plan | **Value observations:** - **Zero budget**: NotebookLM (completely free, 10 decks/day covers most users) - **Low budget**: Gamma Plus ($8/month, full-featured) - **Design quality priority**: Beautiful.ai Pro ($12/month, but weak non-English support) ## Decision Matrix — Which Tool Is Right for You? Rather than picking a single "best" tool, here's how to choose based on your actual situation: **By budget:** - **$0/month** + no editing needed → **NotebookLM** - **$0/month** + editing needed → **Gamma free tier** (note: 400 credits is a hard limit) - **$8–15/month** + non-English primary language → **Gamma Plus** - **$8–15/month** + English-first + design matters → **Beautiful.ai Pro** - **$8–15/month** + already using Canva → **Canva Pro** **By use case:** | Use Case | Recommended Tool | Reason | |----------|-----------------|--------| | Weekly internal status updates | NotebookLM | Free, accurate, no flashy design needed | | Client proposals | Beautiful.ai or Gamma | High design quality, shareable links | | Teaching materials / study guides | NotebookLM | Source-grounded, no hallucinations | | Formal meetings requiring PPT | Copilot + PowerPoint | Native PPT, zero export issues | | Marketing assets | Canva AI | Rich template library, multiple output formats | | Rapid prototyping / brainstorming | Gamma | Fastest generation, strongest structure | **My personal take**: Don't lock yourself into just one tool. In practice, I use NotebookLM (internal reports) + Gamma (quick drafts) + PowerPoint (formal deliverables). Most use cases don't require a paid tool — free plans cover roughly 80% of real-world needs. ## Risks and Caveats **AI content accuracy**: With the exception of NotebookLM, which generates from your source documents, every other tool's AI can introduce incorrect data or fabricated figures into your slides. Every slide containing numbers must be manually reviewed before use. **Pricing changes**: AI tool pricing shifts frequently. Canva, for example, recently raised its price from $12.99 to $15/month. All prices in this article are accurate as of February 2026 — verify current pricing on each tool's website before purchasing. **Free tier limitations**: Gamma's 400 AI credits disappear permanently once used. Think carefully about your usage frequency before investing time in learning the tool. **Data privacy**: Before uploading confidential company data to any third-party AI tool, verify your organization's security policy. NotebookLM (Google) and Copilot (Microsoft) offer more robust data protection commitments at the enterprise tier; evaluate Gamma's and Beautiful.ai's data handling policies independently. **Export format limitations**: If your final deliverable must be a PPTX file, neither Gamma nor NotebookLM is a reliable choice at present. Always test exports before relying on any tool for a high-stakes presentation. ## FAQ **Q: Can AI presentation tools fully replace manual slide creation?** Not yet. Based on hands-on testing, AI-generated presentations typically require 15–30 minutes of manual adjustment before they're ready to use. The value is in eliminating the "blank page" problem, not in full automation. Treat these tools as fast draft generators rather than finished-output machines, and your expectations will be appropriately calibrated. **Q: Which tool handles non-English languages best?** Gamma and Canva are tied at the top. Gamma has stronger AI comprehension of non-English semantic content; Canva offers more extensive font options and a more thoroughly localized interface. Beautiful.ai has the weakest non-English support of the five and is not recommended for teams whose primary language is not English. **Q: Is the free plan enough? When should I upgrade?** If you're making one or two presentations per week, NotebookLM (free) is sufficient. If you're generating presentations daily, or need more refined design and export options, Gamma Plus ($8/month) or Canva Pro ($15/month) are reasonable upgrades. **Q: Can I generate in an AI tool and then edit the output in PowerPoint?** Yes, but the experience varies significantly. Beautiful.ai has the best PPT export fidelity; Canva's export is also solid; Gamma's export suffers from significant layout shifts that require substantial cleanup; NotebookLM currently focuses on PDF export, with PPTX support rolling out gradually. ## Conclusion The AI presentation tool landscape in 2026 looks completely different from a year ago. Tome has exited the market, NotebookLM has entered, and Gamma has surpassed 70 million users — the competitive map is being redrawn at speed. No single tool is perfect. Beautiful.ai has the best design but the weakest non-English support. Gamma generates the fastest but has export problems. NotebookLM is free but limited in editing. **The best strategy isn't finding the "best" tool — it's combining tools based on your specific scenarios.** My recommendation: start from your most common presentation use case, try NotebookLM and Gamma on their free plans, and spend 30 minutes running your own actual source material through each one. You'll find your answer faster than reading any review. --- ## The Complete Guide to Claude Code Costs: Lessons from the OpenClaw OAuth Lockout on Choosing Between Pro, Max, and API URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/openclaw-claude-code-oauth-cost Date: 2026-02-19 Tools: Claude Code, OpenClaw, Anthropic API Concepts: Claude Code, OAuth Authentication, API Pricing, AI Agent Orchestration, Subscription vs Pay-per-use ### Summary After Anthropic blocked third-party OAuth access, which Claude Code plan is right for you — Pro, Max, or API Key? A full cost comparison and decision framework. ### Content # The Complete Guide to Claude Code Costs: Lessons from the OpenClaw OAuth Lockout on Choosing Between Pro, Max, and API In January 2026, Anthropic shut down all third-party tools accessing Claude Code via OAuth tokens overnight. The OpenClaw community erupted. Behind this controversy lies a question every Claude Code user should be able to answer: **What's the real difference between a subscription (Pro/Max) and an API Key? And which plan is right for you?** This article covers the full story, Anthropic's official policy, and a practical cost analysis to give you a clear decision framework. --- ## TL;DR - **Anthropic has explicitly banned** third-party tools from using OAuth tokens — OpenClaw and similar tools must use API Keys - **Pro ($20/mo)** suits light exploration, **Max ($200/mo)** suits daily heavy development, **API** suits teams and automation - Per Anthropic's official data, 90% of developers spend less than $12/day on API usage (~$360/mo), making Max 20x the better deal for most individual developers - The biggest subscription trap: **opaque usage limits** + **shared quota across claude.ai / Claude Code / Desktop** - The key isn't "which is cheaper" — it's "what's your usage pattern" --- ## 1. The OpenClaw Craze and the OAuth Lockout ### What Is OpenClaw? OpenClaw (nicknamed "Lobster AI" in some communities) is a self-hosted AI agent orchestration platform with over **180,000+ GitHub stars** as of February 2026. It connects to external LLMs (Claude, GPT, DeepSeek, etc.) via a local gateway, letting users command AI agents through messaging platforms like Signal, Telegram, and Discord. ### Why Did It Go Viral? The driving force boils down to one word: **savings**. Some users discovered they could use the OAuth token from their Claude Pro/Max subscription (`CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN`) to bypass API billing, enjoying virtually unlimited token usage for a flat monthly fee. With the Max 20x plan at $200/month versus equivalent API usage that could exceed $1,000/month, the price gap was over 5x. Once this "loophole" spread — combined with OpenClaw removing Claude Code's rate limits and enabling overnight automation loops — the community exploded. ### Timeline of Events | Date | Event | |------|-------| | September 2025 | `CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN` authentication issues first appear on GitHub Issues | | January 5–9, 2026 | Anthropic progressively deploys technical safeguards, blocking third-party OAuth access | | January 9, 2026 02:20 UTC | Anthropic engineer publicly states: "tightened our safeguards against spoofing the Claude Code harness" | | January 12, 2026 | Previously banned accounts are unbanned; users can DM to request restoration | | February 2026 | Official clarification: OAuth tokens must not be used with unofficial tools | Community reaction was intense. DHH called the move "very customer hostile," the Hacker News thread garnered 245+ points, and the related GitHub Issue received 147+ reactions. --- ## 2. Anthropic's Official Policy: What You Can and Can't Do ### Policy Red Lines at a Glance Based on Anthropic's Terms of Service and latest updates, the rules are clear: **What's allowed:** - Using the **official Claude Code CLI** with a Pro/Max subscription (this is the intended use case) - Using an **API Key** with any third-party tool (OpenClaw, Cursor, etc.), billed per usage **What's not allowed:** - Using an **OAuth token** with third-party tools — even if you have a paid Pro/Max subscription The key ToS clause states: "accessing the service through automated or non-human means, unless using an Anthropic API Key or with explicit permission." OAuth tokens are officially scoped to the Claude Code CLI only. ### How Does Anthropic Enforce This? Anthropic implemented **client fingerprinting** to detect whether requests come from the official Claude Code client. Non-official clients receive this error: > "This credential is only authorized for use with Claude Code and cannot be used for other API requests" ### The Agent SDK Situation It's worth noting that the Claude Agent SDK currently **only supports API Keys** — Max subscription billing is not supported. This creates an inconsistency: the CLI can use Max quota, but programmatic calls cannot. For developers integrating automated workflows, this is a real limitation. --- ## 3. Full Cost Comparison: Pro vs. Max vs. API ### Plan Overview | Plan | Monthly Cost | Claude Code Usage (5hr window) | Use Case | Hidden Limits | |------|-------------|------|----------|---------------| | **Pro** | $20/mo | ~45 messages | Light use, learning | Shared quota with claude.ai / Desktop | | **Max 5x** | $100/mo | ~225 messages | Daily development | 7-day rolling cap | | **Max 20x** | $200/mo | ~900 messages | Heavy development | 7-day rolling cap | | **API (Sonnet 4)** | Pay-per-use | Unlimited | Teams / automation | $3 input / $15 output per MTok (million tokens) | | **API (Opus 4.6)** | Pay-per-use | Unlimited | Highest quality needs | $5 input / $25 output per MTok | ### The Two-Tier Subscription Limit When using Claude Code on a subscription plan, you'll encounter **two layers of limits**: **Layer 1: 5-hour rolling window.** Starting from your first message, you get a fixed message quota over 5 hours. Pro gets about 45, Max 5x about 225, and Max 20x about 900. Once depleted, you wait for the window to reset. **Layer 2: 7-day rolling cap.** Even if you don't max out individual windows, there's a cumulative limit over 7 days. Anthropic expects fewer than 5% of subscribers to hit this cap, but heavy users should be aware. The easiest trap to fall into is **shared quota**: claude.ai web, Claude Code CLI, and Claude Desktop all draw from the same pool. If you spend 20 minutes chatting on the web in the morning, your Claude Code quota for the afternoon shrinks. ### API Cost-Saving Strategies API pay-per-use looks expensive at first glance, but two official mechanisms can cut costs dramatically: - **Batch API**: A flat **50% discount** on both input and output, in exchange for asynchronous processing within 24 hours - **Prompt Caching**: Cache reads cost just **0.1x** the base input price — a **90% saving**. Combined with Batch API, savings can reach up to 95% ### Cost Estimates for Three Usage Scenarios According to Anthropic's official data, the average developer spends **$6/day** on Claude Code API usage, with 90% spending under **$12/day**. Community reports on Reddit's r/ClaudeCode and Hacker News largely match this: daily feature work and debugging typically falls in the $5–$15 range, but large-scale refactors or multi-agent workflows can push daily costs to $30–$50. Here are three typical scenarios: **Light user (5–10 prompts/day, small fixes)** - API estimate: ~$2–4/day → $60–120/month - Best choice: **Pro at $20/month** wins easily **Daily developer (20–50 prompts/day, feature development)** - API estimate: ~$6–12/day → $180–360/month - Best choice: **Max 20x at $200/month** is more cost-effective in most cases **Heavy / automation user (100+ prompts/day, CI/CD, multi-agent)** - API estimate: ~$20–50/day → $600–1,500/month - Best choice: **API Key + Batch/Caching optimization**, since subscription limits become a bottleneck --- ## 4. Decision Framework: Which Plan Should You Choose? ### Decision Tree Follow your use case through these questions: 1. **Do you need third-party tools or automation?** → Yes → **API Key** (no other option — OAuth can't be used with third-party tools) 2. **Are you a team (5+ people)?** → Yes → Consider **Teams plan** or **API Key** 3. **Do you need precise cost control?** → Yes → **API Key + Caching/Batch** 4. **Is your monthly usage equivalent under $20?** → Yes → **Pro** 5. **Is your monthly usage equivalent $20–$200?** → Yes → **Max 5x or 20x** 6. **Do you frequently hit rate limits?** → Yes → Consider switching to **API Key** ### The Hybrid Strategy The smartest approach is often a **hybrid**: - **Daily interactive development** on Max subscription (fixed cost, no bill anxiety) - **Automation scripts and CI/CD** on API Key (no rate limits, pay-per-use) - Set workspace spend limits in the Anthropic Console to prevent unexpected API overages ### When to Switch from Max to API If you find yourself **hitting rate limits at least twice per week**, your Max quota is no longer sufficient. Switching to API usually makes more sense at that point — even if the monthly bill is higher, at least your workflow won't be interrupted by throttling. --- ## 5. Risk Disclosure Before making your decision, be clear on these risks: **Compliance risk**: Using OAuth tokens with third-party tools like OpenClaw explicitly violates Anthropic's ToS. Past incidents show accounts can be banned. While previous bans were reversed, there's no guarantee of leniency next time. **Security risk**: OpenClaw has known critical vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-25253 (CVSS 8.8) is a remote code execution flaw that allows attackers to steal authentication tokens via malicious links. Security researchers estimate tens of thousands to over a hundred thousand OpenClaw instances are exposed on the public internet (figures vary widely depending on scanning methodology). If you use OpenClaw, make sure you've updated to v2026.1.29 or later and properly isolated it on your network. **Rate limit risk**: Subscriptions cannot guarantee stable throughput. If your workflow depends on uninterrupted AI assistance (e.g., lengthy code refactors), hitting rate limits will break your flow. **Pricing change risk**: Anthropic may adjust subscription plans, limits, and pricing at any time. Current terms are not locked in. **Vendor lock-in**: Over-reliance on a single AI provider carries long-term risk. Consider maintaining architectural flexibility to switch models if needed. --- ## FAQ **Q1: Will I get banned for using Claude Pro/Max with OpenClaw?** A: **There's a real risk.** Anthropic explicitly blocked this usage in January 2026 and deployed client fingerprinting to detect unofficial clients. While the first wave of bans was reversed, the ToS has since been updated. The likelihood of permanent bans for repeat violations is higher. If you want to use OpenClaw, use an API Key. **Q2: Will API Key costs really exceed $200/month (Max price)?** A: **It depends on your usage.** Per Anthropic's official data, 90% of developers spend under $12/day on API — roughly $360/month. But with Prompt Caching (90% savings) and Batch API (50% off), actual costs can drop to $100–200/month. Heavy users without optimization could exceed $500/month. **Q3: How exactly does the 5-hour usage limit work?** A: The 5-hour window starts from your **first message** in that window. During this period, Pro gets ~45 messages, Max 5x ~225, and Max 20x ~900. Once used up, you wait for the window to expire. Note that this is a rolling window, not a fixed daily reset. **Q4: If I only use the official Claude Code CLI, what's the difference between Pro and Max?** A: The main difference is the **usage multiplier**. Pro is 5x the Free tier, Max 5x is 25x, and Max 20x is 100x. For occasional small fixes, Pro is fine. But for daily use or large-scale refactoring, Pro's quota will be exhausted within hours. The shared quota issue is also more noticeable on Pro — since the base is smaller, web usage eats a larger proportion. **Q5: Can I get both subscription savings and API flexibility?** A: Yes — that's the **hybrid strategy** described above. Use Max for daily interactive development (fixed cost, low mental overhead) and API Key for automation and CI/CD (no rate limits, precise billing). Claude Code supports having both a subscription account and an API Key configured simultaneously. --- ## Conclusion The OAuth gray area is closed. Anthropic's stance is clear: **official tools use subscriptions, third-party tools use API Keys.** There's no third option. The choice is simpler than it seems. Match it to your usage pattern: - **Occasional use, mainly learning** → Pro $20/month - **Daily driver, primary tool** → Max $200/month - **Automation, team collaboration, or third-party tools** → API Key If you're unsure, the safest starting point is **Max 5x ($100/month)** — enough for most daily development, with room to upgrade to 20x or switch to API if you hit limits. For readers interested in setting up OpenClaw itself, check out [this setup decision guide](/posts/should-i-setup-an-openclaw) and [the alternatives security comparison](/posts/openclaw-alternatives-guide) for full isolation strategies. --- ## 2026 PMP Certification Guide: Exam Changes, Study Strategy & An Honest Assessment of Whether It's Worth It URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/pmp-certification-guide-2026 Date: 2026-02-19 Tools: PMI Study Hall, Udemy, PrepCast Concepts: PMP Certification, Project Management, PMBOK 8, Agile Methodology, Career Development ### Summary The PMP exam undergoes a major overhaul in July 2026 — Business Environment weight jumps to 26%, with new AI and ESG topics. This guide covers decision frameworks, ROI analysis, and the latest study strategies. ### Content # 2026 PMP Certification Guide: Exam Changes, Study Strategy & An Honest Assessment of Whether It's Worth It The PMP (Project Management Professional) exam is about to undergo its most significant overhaul since 2021, launching in July 2026. The Business Environment domain weight jumps from 8% to 26%, AI and ESG sustainability become official exam topics, and both question count and time allotment have been adjusted. Faced with these changes, you're probably wondering: should you rush to take the current exam before the changeover, or wait and prepare for the new version? And the more fundamental question — is PMP still worth the investment in 2026? I passed the PMP back in 2017 and later wrote [a study guide for the 2021 exam version](/posts/how-to-get-pmp-2021). Having watched the exam evolve from PMBOK 6 to 7 and now to 8, the biggest takeaway is this: the exam itself has changed, employers' attitudes toward it have changed, but most PMP prep advice is still stuck in the old paradigm. This guide doesn't presuppose an answer — it gives you everything you need to make your own decision. ## TL;DR - **Starting July 2026**, the PMP exam aligns with PMBOK 8 — Business Environment weight triples (8% to 26%), with new AI and ESG topics - **Total investment: $1,500–$3,500** (including training, exam fee, and membership), with a first-attempt pass rate of roughly 65–70% - Certification holders earn a **median of ~24% more** than non-holders, but PMP is a "door opener," not a guarantee - **Before July 8, 2026**, you can take the current exam; after that, the new version applies — new study resources launch April 14 - Not everyone needs a PMP — this guide includes a decision framework to help you figure it out ## What's Changing in 2026? Full Side-by-Side Comparison PMI has confirmed the new PMP exam will launch in **July 2026** (the last day for the current exam is July 8), aligned with PMBOK 8th Edition, released in November 2025. Here's a complete comparison: | Item | Current Exam (through 7/8/2026) | New Exam (from 7/2026) | |------|-------------------------------|----------------------| | Questions | 180 (175 scored + 5 pretest) | **180** | | Time | 230 minutes | **240 minutes** | | People Weight | 42% | **33%** | | Process Weight | 50% | **41%** | | Business Environment | 8% | **26%** | | Question Types | Multiple choice, multiple select, matching, drag-and-drop, fill-in-the-blank | All of the above + **chart/graph interpretation** | | Aligned Material | PMBOK 7 + Process Groups Guide | **PMBOK 8** | ### Three Major New Exam Topics **1. AI in Project Management** The new exam content outline explicitly includes AI as a tested topic, covering AI-assisted planning, predictive analytics, automated tracking, and AI ethics considerations. **2. ESG and Sustainability Integration** The traditional "iron triangle" (scope, time, cost) evolves to incorporate environmental impact, social responsibility, and ethical decision-making. Candidates need to understand how carbon footprint, social value, and similar factors influence project decisions. **3. The Modern PMO Evolution** The exam will assess candidates' understanding of the evolving role of the Project Management Office (PMO), including the shift from a compliance-focused function to a strategic partner. ### PMBOK 8 vs. PMBOK 7 PMBOK 7 replaced PMBOK 6's process-driven approach with a principle-based framework. PMBOK 8 takes this further by integrating AI, sustainability, and other modern topics. The PMBOK 8 digital edition was released on November 13, 2025, with the print edition following in January 2026. PMI members can download the digital version for free from the PMI website. ## Is PMP Still Worth It in 2026? An Honest ROI Analysis ### Salary Data: The Gap Is Real According to PMI's 2025 Salary Power Survey (14th edition): - Median annual salary for PMP holders in the U.S.: **$135,000** - Median annual salary for non-certified PMs in the U.S.: **$109,157** - Gap of approximately **24%** (~$25,843/year) - Holders with 10+ years of certification reach a median of **$173,000** Over **1.4 million** professionals worldwide currently hold the PMP certification. > **A word of caution**: Correlation is not causation. People who earn the PMP tend to already have significant experience and a commitment to professional development — traits that independently correlate with higher salaries. PMP may be a "correlated factor" rather than the direct cause. ### Total Cost Breakdown: It's More Than Just the Exam Fee | Cost Item | PMI Member | Non-Member | |-----------|-----------|------------| | PMI annual + joining fee (first year) | $164 | — | | Exam fee | $405 | $655–$675* | | 35-hour training course | $15–$2,000+ | $15–$2,000+ | | Study materials (PMBOK, etc.) | Free (member benefit) | $50–$100 | | Practice exam platform | $0–$150 | $0–$150 | | **First-attempt total** | **$584–$2,719** | **$720–$2,925** | *Non-member exam fees vary by region: $675 in the U.S. (increasing August 2025), $655 elsewhere. **Renewal cost (every 3 years)**: Member $60 / Non-member $150 + the time investment for 60 PDUs > **Money-saving tip**: Join PMI first ($164 for the first year) — the exam fee discount of $250–$270 alone nearly covers the membership cost, and you get free access to the PMBOK digital edition. Udemy courses on sale typically cost $10–15 and satisfy the 35-hour education requirement — no need to spend thousands on a boot camp. ### What Employers Actually Think PMP's value varies significantly by industry: - **Still highly valued**: Consulting firms, government contracts, construction, manufacturing, large enterprises (PMP required for bids or promotions) - **Increasingly indifferent**: Tech startups, software companies (prefer demonstrated Scrum/Kanban experience and delivery track records) - **Divided**: Financial services (some require it, some don't care) ## Should You Get Certified? A Three-Minute Decision Framework Not everyone needs a PMP. Use this framework to decide: **Strongly recommended** - You have 3+ years of PM experience, and your target employer or industry explicitly requires PMP - You work in consulting, government projects, construction, or other certification-heavy sectors - You're planning an international career move and need a globally recognized PM credential **Worth considering, but keep expectations realistic** - You have PM experience but your company doesn't require it — you want to formalize your knowledge - You're transitioning into PM with some related experience and need a credibility boost **Consider waiting or exploring alternatives** - You want to become a PM but lack hands-on experience — build experience first, or start with CAPM - You're a senior PM and your company doesn't require it — ROI is low; invest your time in practical skills instead - You work in a pure Scrum environment — PSM (Professional Scrum Master) is a better fit - You're a freelancer or entrepreneur — clients care about your portfolio, not your certifications **Alternative Certifications at a Glance** | Certification | Issuing Body | Focus | Prerequisites | Renewal | |---------------|-------------|-------|---------------|---------| | PMP | PMI | Full-spectrum PM | 36–60 months experience | 60 PDUs every 3 years | | PMI-ACP | PMI | Agile methods | 8 months agile experience (with bachelor's) | 30 PDUs every 3 years | | PSM I | Scrum.org | Scrum | None | Lifetime validity | | PRINCE2 | Axelos | Process-driven PM | None | Varies by level | | Google PM Certificate | Google | PM fundamentals | None | No renewal required | ## "Rush the Current Exam" or "Wait for the New One"? Timeline Strategy This is the most critical decision for 2026 PMP candidates. Here are the key dates: ``` Now (Feb 2026) → 4/14 New study resources launch → 7/8 Last day for current exam → 7/9 New exam goes live ``` ### Rush the Current Exam (before July 8) **This is right for you if:** - You've already covered 50% or more of the material - You're familiar with PMBOK 7 and the Process Groups Guide - You'd rather not learn the new PMBOK 8 content (AI/ESG/modern PMO) - You can dedicate enough study time over the next 4–5 months **Advantage**: Abundant prep materials and practice exams, battle-tested by thousands of candidates **Risk**: Time pressure is real — if you don't pass on your first attempt, your retake may fall under the new exam content ### Wait for the New Exam (after July 9) **This is right for you if:** - You're just starting to prepare, or haven't started yet - You have some background or interest in AI and sustainability - You're not under pressure to certify by a specific date - You're willing to wait for new study materials and practice exams to mature **Advantage**: More preparation time, and the new exam content better reflects modern PM practice **Risk**: Fewer study resources and community experience reports in the early months after launch > **Practical advice**: If you're just starting your prep now (February 2026), the timeline for the current exam is extremely tight. Unless you can study full-time, aim for the new exam instead. PMI launches new study resources on April 14 — that's a good time to begin your prep in earnest. ## 2026 Study Plan (3–4 Month Roadmap) ### Step Zero: Earn 35 Contact Hours of PM Education This is a hard PMI requirement for exam registration. Every candidate must complete 35 hours of formal PM education. Note: self-study and practice exam hours do not count — it must be a structured course (online courses qualify). CAPM holders are exempt from this requirement. ### Phased Study Plan Below is a steady-paced roadmap for those studying while working. When I prepared in 2017, I managed to pass within a month while holding a full-time job — but that meant studying every evening after work and most of every weekend. If you'd rather not maintain that intensity, giving yourself 3–4 months is much more manageable. **Weeks 1–2: Build Your Knowledge Framework** - Skim through the PMBOK (7 or 8, depending on which exam version you're targeting) - Understand the exam structure, question types, and domain weights - Identify your personal weak areas **Weeks 3–6: Systematic Study** - Complete a 35-hour online course (this also satisfies the registration requirement). Recommended: [Andrew Ramdayal's PMP 35 PDU Course](https://www.udemy.com/course/pmp-certification-exam-prep-course-pmbok-6th-edition/) or [Joseph Phillips' PMP Exam Prep Seminar](https://www.udemy.com/course/pmp-pmbok6-35-pdus/) — both under $15 on Udemy sales - Study 1–2 hours daily, taking notes and organizing key concepts - Focus on mastering the reasoning behind situational judgment questions **Weeks 7–10: Practice Exams + Targeted Review** - Complete one full-length practice exam (180 questions) per week. Consider the [720-question practice exam set](https://www.udemy.com/course/pmp-practice-exams-pmbok-guide-6th-edition/), or for the new exam, try the [2026 PMP Mock Practice Tests](https://www.udemy.com/course/2021-pmp-mock-practice-tests/) - Analyze every wrong answer and focus on weak areas - Target: consistently scoring 75% or above on practice exams **Weeks 11–12: Final Sprint** - Review all missed questions and weak concepts - Take 1–2 more full-length practice exams - Schedule your exam date (leave 1–2 weeks of buffer) ### Recommended Study Resources **Online Courses (with 35-hour certificate)** | Course | Instructor | Highlights | Exam Version | |--------|-----------|------------|-------------| | [PMP Certification Exam Prep Course 35 PDU Contact Hours](https://www.udemy.com/course/pmp-certification-exam-prep-course-pmbok-6th-edition/) | Andrew Ramdayal | Udemy Bestseller, 4.7 stars, 300K+ students, "PMI Mindset" approach | Current exam | | [PMP Exam Prep Seminar - Complete Exam Coverage with 35 PDUs](https://www.udemy.com/course/pmp-pmbok6-35-pdus/) | Joseph Phillips | Long-running classic course, continuously updated | Current exam | > **Tip**: Udemy courses go on sale for $10–15 nearly every month. If you're targeting the new exam after July, consider waiting until April to purchase — more PMBOK 8-aligned courses will be available by then. **Practice Exam Platforms** | Platform | Questions | Price | Highlights | |----------|-----------|-------|------------| | PMI Study Hall Plus | Full mock exams + Mini Exams | ~$49–$99 | Official PMI product, closest to real exam thinking, but difficulty runs high | | PrepCast PMP Exam Simulator | 1,930 questions | ~$139–$149 (90 days) | Industry gold standard for third-party practice exams, detailed explanations | | [PMP Certification Exam Prep Exam 720 Questions](https://www.udemy.com/course/pmp-practice-exams-pmbok-guide-6th-edition/) | 720 questions | Udemy sale $10–15 | By Andrew Ramdayal, pairs well with his main course | | [2026 PMP Mock Practice Tests](https://www.udemy.com/course/2021-pmp-mock-practice-tests/) | 720 questions | Udemy sale $10–15 | Aligned with PMBOK 8, includes AI and sustainability topics | | [The Complete PMP Exam Simulator 2026](https://www.udemy.com/course/the-complete-pmp-exam-simulator-2026-6-mock-exams/) | 1,080 questions | Udemy sale $10–15 | 6 full-length mock exams, scenario-based questions | **Exam Language Strategy** The PMP exam is available in over 15 languages. For non-native English speakers, PMI offers a bilingual aid feature: you select your primary exam language and can enable a secondary translation displayed side by side. This is highly recommended — take the exam in the language you're most comfortable with, and use the secondary English (or other language) display as a reference when terminology is unclear. Note that the new exam launching in July 2026 may initially be available only in English, with additional languages rolling out afterward. ## Risk Disclosure and Caveats Having tracked the PMP ecosystem since 2018, I've observed a clear shift in how the market views this certification. Here's what you need to know before committing: **Certification Does Not Equal Competence** The PMP tests your knowledge of project management concepts — not your ability to actually manage projects. Exam scenarios have "correct" answers, but real-world project management rarely does. Some of the best PMs I've worked with have never held a certification. **Renewal Is an Ongoing Commitment** Every 3 years, you need 60 PDUs (Professional Development Units) plus a renewal fee (member $60 / non-member $150). If you're not genuinely committed to continued learning in the PM space, this renewal cycle becomes a burden. **Employer Attitudes Are Polarizing** Some tech companies have moved from "PMP required" to "we don't want the PMP mindset." They view the PMBOK framework as too rigid and incompatible with agile delivery. In the job market, PMP is a plus at some companies and a minus at others. **First-Attempt Pass Rate Is Roughly 65–70%** PMI stopped publishing official pass rates in 2005, but industry estimates place the first-attempt pass rate at 65–70%. Retake fees are $275 (member) / $375 (non-member). That means roughly 30–35% of candidates need to invest additional time and money. **AI's Long-Term Impact on the PM Role** Ironically, while the new PMP exam adds AI as a topic, AI itself is automating parts of traditional PM work — scheduling, progress tracking, risk assessment. The long-term value of the PMP credential depends on how the PM role evolves, and nobody can predict that with certainty right now. ## FAQ **Q1: Can I take the PMP exam in my native language?** A: Yes. The current PMP exam supports over 15 languages, including Spanish, Korean, Japanese, Chinese (Traditional and Simplified), French, German, Portuguese, and more. PMI also offers a bilingual aid feature where your primary exam language is displayed alongside a secondary translation. This is highly recommended for non-native English speakers. Note that the new exam launching in July 2026 may initially be available only in English, with other language versions expected to follow. **Q2: Can I take the PMP without project management experience?** A: No. PMI requires hands-on experience: four-year degree holders need 36 months of project management experience + 35 hours of PM education; high school/associate's degree holders need 60 months + 35 hours. Experience must have been gained within the last 8 years. If you don't yet meet the requirements, consider starting with the CAPM (Certified Associate in Project Management), which has no experience prerequisite. **Q3: Will my existing PMP certification remain valid after the 2026 exam change?** A: Absolutely. PMP certifications are version-independent — it doesn't matter when you passed the exam, your credential carries the same weight. The exam update changes the content being tested, not the certifications already issued. As long as you maintain your credential (60 PDUs every 3 years), your PMP remains fully valid. **Q4: Should I get PMP, PMI-ACP, or Scrum Master?** A: It depends on your work environment. PMP covers predictive + agile + hybrid approaches, best for those managing diverse project types. PMI-ACP focuses on agile methods (not limited to Scrum), ideal if you work across multiple agile frameworks. PSM is focused on the Scrum framework, issued by Scrum.org, with lifetime validity and no renewal required. If you can only pick one and your work environment uses a mix of methodologies, PMP offers the broadest coverage. **Q5: Can I pass the PMP through self-study?** A: Self-study is absolutely viable. However, you still need 35 contact hours of formal PM education (a hard PMI requirement — self-study doesn't count). The most affordable approach is to purchase a PMI-authorized course on Udemy, which typically costs $10–15 on sale and satisfies the 35-hour requirement. Combined with the free PMBOK digital edition (a PMI membership benefit) and a practice exam platform, you can keep your total spending under $600. ## Conclusion PMP remains the most widely recognized project management certification in the world in 2026, and the salary advantage for certification holders is real. But it's not a silver bullet — not everyone needs it, and passing the exam doesn't guarantee a promotion or a raise. Before you decide, come back to three core questions: 1. **Does your target employer or industry value PMP?** If yes, it's worth the investment. 2. **Do you have the time and budget?** A total investment of $1,500–$3,500 plus 3–4 months of preparation — make sure you can commit. 3. **Are you timing it right?** If you're just starting now, aim for the new exam after July. If all three answers are yes, start your study plan today. Join PMI, download the PMBOK, pick an online course — and manage your exam prep the way you'd manage a project: set clear milestones and weekly targets. --- ## What Is Drop Servicing? A Complete Guide to This Low-Cost Business Model in the AI Era URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/what-is-drop-servicing Date: 2026-02-19 Tools: Fiverr, Upwork Concepts: Business, Marketing, Productivity ### Summary Drop servicing is a service arbitrage business model that lets you start a business with minimal skills and capital. But AI is rewriting the rules — here's which niches are dying and which are thriving. ### Content # What Is Drop Servicing? A Complete Guide to This Low-Cost Business Model in the AI Era Drop servicing was once considered the lightest way to start a business — no skills required, no inventory, just be a good "service middleman" and pocket the margin. But here's the 2025 reality: AI is eating into demand for basic outsourced services. According to Ramp's data, among companies that used freelancers in 2022, more than half have stopped entirely. Does that mean drop servicing is dead? Not quite. This article breaks down what this business model really looks like in the AI era: which niches you should avoid, which ones are booming, and a step-by-step process you can start today. ## TL;DR - **Drop servicing = service arbitrage**: You take client orders, outsource to freelancers or use AI tools for delivery, and keep margins of roughly 50% or more - **AI is a double-edged sword**: Demand for basic services (copywriting, translation, template design) is being eaten by AI, but "AI + human review" hybrid delivery creates new opportunities - **Startup costs are extremely low**, but the real challenges are client acquisition and quality control - **Niches worth pursuing in 2025**: AI workflow deployment, AI content quality review, customized local services - **Not for those seeking fully passive income** — quality management requires ongoing effort ## What Is Drop Servicing? The Business Model Explained Simply put, drop servicing is **being the middleman for services**. You're the bridge between "people who need services" and "people who provide them": clients pay you, you outsource to freelancers, and you keep the difference. Here's a concrete example: > A client needs a company logo and is willing to pay $500. You find a well-rated designer on Fiverr whose quote is $150. You pass the brief to the designer, receive the finished work, and deliver it to the client. **Your gross profit: $350 (70%)**. The logic is identical to dropshipping, except you're dealing in services instead of products. The key difference: - **Dropshipping**: Reselling physical products with relatively standardized quality and clear return processes - **Drop servicing**: Reselling services where every delivery is customized, making quality control significantly harder This isn't a new concept — ad agencies, consulting firms, and outsourcing brokers have been doing exactly this for years. Drop servicing simply scales it down to a one-person operation. In terms of market size, the global gig economy reached USD 556.7 billion in 2024, projected to grow to USD 2.15 trillion by 2033. The freelance platforms market is also expanding from USD 7.65 billion in 2025 to a projected USD 16.54 billion by 2030 (CAGR 16.66%). In other words, the supply of freelancers will only keep growing — which means more potential partners for drop servicers. ## Why Drop Servicing Still Works in 2025 You might be wondering: with AI this powerful, does anyone still need outsourced services? The answer: **yes, but the demand is shifting.** According to Ramp's research, the share of corporate spending on labor marketplace platforms plummeted from 0.66% in Q4 2021 to 0.14% in Q3 2025. On the surface, outsourcing demand appears to be shrinking. But dig deeper and you'll find that what's shrinking is **basic, AI-replaceable services**, not all outsourcing demand. Here's why drop servicing remains viable in 2025: 1. **The pain of managing freelancers hasn't gone away.** Finding talent, communicating requirements, reviewing deliverables, handling revisions — these management costs make many SMBs willing to pay a premium for a reliable middleman. 2. **AI lowers delivery costs but increases the middleman's value.** You can use AI for first drafts and have humans do the final quality check, drastically cutting delivery costs while keeping client pricing the same — margins actually go up. 3. **AI skills command a premium.** According to the PwC 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer, positions requiring AI skills carry a 56% wage premium. If you can offer "AI-powered" service packages, your pricing power is significantly higher than traditional outsourcing. ## Niche Survival Analysis in the AI Era — What to Pursue and What to Avoid This is the most critical part of the entire article. Pick the wrong niche and your drop servicing business could be wiped out by AI tools within six months. ### Avoid: Dead or Dying Niches - **Basic copywriting**: Blog posts, product descriptions, social media captions — ChatGPT and Claude can produce serviceable drafts in seconds. Clients no longer need to pay $50–200 for outsourcing. - **Simple translation**: For general business documents, AI translation quality is already good enough. - **Template-based design**: Business cards, simple logos, social media graphics — Canva + AI lets non-designers handle these on their own. The common thread: **output is highly standardized and doesn't require deep human judgment**. ### Opportunity Zone: Emerging High-Value Niches - **AI workflow deployment**: Helping businesses build AI automation (e.g., auto-classifying support tickets, auto-generating reports). Most SMBs know AI is powerful but have no idea how to integrate it into their workflows — that's your opportunity. - **AI content quality review**: After companies mass-produce content with AI, they need human review for quality, fact-checking, and brand voice alignment. This is the "last mile" that AI can't handle alone. - **AI-driven SEO strategy execution**: Combining AI tools for keyword research, content planning, and technical SEO optimization — this requires strategic thinking, not just execution. - **AI video production and post-production**: AI can generate rough cuts, but fine-tuned post-production, subtitles, sound effects, and brand consistency still need human input. ### Still Stable Niches - **Customized local services**: Home cleaning, moving, event planning — these require physical execution and AI can't replace them. - **Professional service referrals (legal, financial, medical)**: Highly specialized with regulatory barriers, but you can serve as a referral platform. ## 5 Steps to Launch Your Drop Servicing Business ### Step 1: Choose an AI-Resistant Niche Based on hands-on experience building a drop servicing business, the selection criteria boil down to three questions: 1. Can AI tools complete this service in 5 minutes? If yes, stay away. 2. Does the deliverable require human judgment or customized communication? If yes, it's viable. 3. Are clients willing to pay a high price ($500+) for this? If yes, it's worth pursuing. ### Step 2: Build Your Service Provider Network Practical tips for vetting freelancers on Fiverr and Upwork: - **Check completed orders and ratings**, but more importantly, read the **negative reviews** — late deliveries and communication issues are the biggest red flags. - **Test with a small order first**: Spend $20–50 on a small job to evaluate delivery quality and communication efficiency. - **Have 2–3 backup freelancers ready** to avoid single points of failure. Advanced strategy: Build a hybrid "AI + human" team. Use AI tools (like ChatGPT or Claude) to produce first drafts or frameworks, then have freelancers do the refinement and quality assurance. This can cut delivery costs by 30–50% without compromising the quality clients experience. ### Step 3: Set Up Your Storefront The minimum viable version only requires: - **A one-page landing page**: Clearly stating what service you offer, why clients should choose you, and how to contact you - **An order intake method**: Google Forms or Typeform work fine — no need for a complex shopping cart - **A professional email**: Use your own domain (e.g., hello@yourbrand.com), not Gmail Tool recommendations: Carrd (free landing pages), Google Workspace (professional email), Notion (project management). ### Step 4: Set Your Pricing Strategy The basic principle: **charge 2–4x what you pay your freelancer**. With AI hybrid delivery, your costs are even lower and the pricing advantage becomes more obvious: | Delivery Method | Your Cost | Client Price | Gross Margin | |----------------|-----------|-------------|-------------| | Freelancer only | $150 | $500 | 70% | | AI draft + freelancer refinement | $50–80 | $500 | 84–90% | Don't compete on price. Your value lies in **saving clients the time and effort of managing outsourcing themselves**, not in being the cheapest option. ### Step 5: Land Your First 10 Clients Cold-starting is the hardest part. Recommended strategies: 1. **Do 2–3 jobs for free or at a discount**: Build your portfolio and collect client testimonials — this is your most important marketing asset. 2. **Actively provide value in communities where your target clients hang out**: Facebook groups, LinkedIn, relevant forums — help answer questions, build credibility, then naturally funnel traffic. 3. **Invest in long-term SEO**: Write educational content related to your niche to attract potential clients who are actively searching. 4. **Don't blow money on ads right away** — validate market demand through free channels first. Only consider paid advertising once you've confirmed people will pay. ## Drop Servicing vs Dropshipping — Which Should You Choose? These two models are often compared. The choice comes down to your strengths: | Dimension | Drop Servicing | Dropshipping | |-----------|---------------|--------------| | Startup Cost | Extremely low (tens to hundreds of dollars) | Low to medium (store setup + ad spend) | | Gross Margin | ~50% or higher | Appears high, but ads and logistics eat most of it | | Quality Control | Difficult (services aren't standardized) | Easier (physical products can be returned/exchanged) | | AI Impact | Double-edged sword (threat + opportunity) | Relatively minor | | Scalability | Limited by personnel management | Highly automatable | | Best For | Strong communicators, project managers | Product selectors, ad specialists | **Simple decision framework**: If you're good at managing people and communicating → drop servicing. If you're good at picking products and running ads → dropshipping. They're not mutually exclusive either — some entrepreneurs run both. ## Risk Disclosure Before you dive in, you need to clearly understand these risks: **Quality control risk**: The quality you promise clients is actually delivered by third-party freelancers. I've personally experienced freelancers disappearing mid-project and delivering work far below expectations — whether it's a redo or a refund, the cost falls on you. **AI displacement risk**: The niche you choose today could be made obsolete by a new AI tool within 6–12 months. The pace of change in this space is unprecedented — you need to continuously monitor the market and be ready to pivot. **Legal and tax risk**: Service reselling involves contractual liability. If a freelancer's deliverable infringes on someone's intellectual property, you as the service provider to the client may be held legally responsible. Consult a professional and clearly define liability in your contracts. **Not passive income**: Drop servicing is not a "set it and forget it" model. Quality control, client communication, and freelancer management all require ongoing time investment. If you're looking for purely passive income, this isn't the right choice. **Margin compression**: Low barriers to entry mean more people will enter the market, especially in popular niches. As competition intensifies, price wars are almost inevitable — unless you can establish clear differentiation in quality or delivery speed. ## FAQ **Q1: Is drop servicing legal?** A: Absolutely. Drop servicing is essentially service reselling and project management — consulting firms and ad agencies do the same thing. Just make sure you have proper service agreements, comply with consumer protection laws, and handle tax reporting correctly. **Q2: Can I do drop servicing with no professional skills?** A: Yes, but you need communication and basic project management abilities. You don't need to design logos or write code, but you must be able to evaluate freelancer output quality, clearly communicate client requirements, and coordinate solutions when things go wrong. **Q3: How much does it cost to start a drop servicing business?** A: You can start with as little as a few dozen dollars (domain + basic hosting). We recommend budgeting USD 200–500 to cover a landing page, small test orders with freelancers, and initial marketing costs. **Q4: Will AI make drop servicing obsolete?** A: Not entirely, but niche selection is now critical. Basic copywriting and simple translation services are being replaced by AI, but high-value services requiring human judgment (AI workflow deployment, quality review) are actually creating new opportunities. The key is choosing the right niche and leveraging AI as your delivery tool rather than your competitor. **Q5: Is drop servicing a good side hustle?** A: Yes, though the initial setup phase requires more time investment to build processes, vet freelancers, and land your first few clients. From experience, once your workflow is stable, 5–10 hours per week is usually enough to maintain operations. ## Conclusion Drop servicing in the AI era isn't dead — it's evolved. Those still selling basic copywriting and simple translations will be weeded out, but those who choose the right niche and leverage AI tools to reduce delivery costs can actually find better margins in this wave of change. Your next step is simple: pick a niche from the "opportunity zone" above that interests you, set up a landing page with Carrd today, find 2–3 candidate freelancers on Fiverr, and start providing value in your target community. Your first order might come sooner than you think. --- ## GitHub Trending Weekly 2026-02-18: Official AI Toolchains, Skills Ecosystem Forming, Backend Engineering Strikes Back URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/github-trending-weekly-2026-02-18 Date: 2026-02-18 Tools: langextract, gh-aw, tambo, claude-skills, sql-tap, zeroclaw, chrome-devtools-mcp, pi-mono, Personal_AI_Infrastructure, gogcli, summarize, heretic, greenlight, portless, ClawWork, FastCode, react-doctor, vscode-dark-islands, k-id-age-verifier, ai-daily-digest Concepts: Open Source, GitHub, AI Agents, Developer Tools, MCP, Coding Agent, Generative UI ### Summary 2/11–2/18 GitHub's most notable open source projects: Fastest Growing Top 10 + Top New Repos Top 10 coverage. langextract +6,121 stars, gh-aw HN 302 points, sql-tap HN 231 points surprisingly viral. Official AI toolchains, Skills ecosystem, backend engineering counterattack. ### Content # GitHub Trending Weekly 2026-02-18: Official AI Toolchains, Skills Ecosystem Forming, Backend Engineering Strikes Back > **Data Period**: 2026-02-11 ~ 2026-02-18 (Rolling 7 days) > **Sources**: GitHub Trending weekly + monthly, GitHub Search API, HN Algolia **TL;DR**: The biggest surprise this week is a Go language SQL tool—`mickamy/sql-tap`, which scored 231 points and 44 comments on HN, breaking through the wave of AI agent tools with pure engineering value. The weekly growth champion is Google's own `langextract` (+6,121 stars), while `github/gh-aw`'s 302 HN points signal that GitHub itself is pushing AI agents into CI/CD. `pi-mono`, `tambo`, and `gogcli` simultaneously appear in weekly and monthly trends, showing clear signals of sustained popularity. --- ## 📈 Fastest Growing — Top 10 Star Growth This Week > Source: `github.com/trending?since=weekly` > 🔁 = Also in monthly trends (Sustained popularity signal) | # | Project | +Stars/Week | Total Stars | Language | Created | |---|------|-----------|---------|------|------| | 1 | [google/langextract](https://github.com/google/langextract) | **+6,121** | ★32,957 | Python | 2025-07 | | 2 🔁 | [badlogic/pi-mono](https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono) | **+3,326** | ★13,327 | TypeScript | 2025-08 | | 3 🔁 | [tambo-ai/tambo](https://github.com/tambo-ai/tambo) | **+2,540** | ★10,641 | TypeScript | 2024-06 | | 4 | [Jeffallan/claude-skills](https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills) | **+2,461** | ★3,077 | Python | 2025-10 | | 5 | [danielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure](https://github.com/danielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure) | **+2,263** | ★8,730 | TypeScript | 2025-09 | | 6 🔁 | [steipete/gogcli](https://github.com/steipete/gogcli) | **+2,144** | ★4,008 | Go | 2025-12 | | 7 | [ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp](https://github.com/ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp) | **+2,059** | ★25,839 | TypeScript | 2025-09 | | 8 | [github/gh-aw](https://github.com/github/gh-aw) | **+1,872** | ★3,107 | Go | 2025-08 | | 9 | [p-e-w/heretic](https://github.com/p-e-w/heretic) | **+1,778** | ★7,646 | Python | 2025-09 | | 10 | [steipete/summarize](https://github.com/steipete/summarize) | **+1,628** | ★3,598 | TypeScript | 2025-12 | --- ## 🆕 Top New Repos — Top 10 New Projects This Week > Source: GitHub Search API (`created:2026-02-11..2026-02-18`, sorted by total stars) | # | Project | Total Stars | Language | Created Date | |---|------|---------|------|---------| | 1 | [zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw](https://github.com/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw) | **★11,846** | Rust | 2026-02-13 | | 2 | [bwya77/vscode-dark-islands](https://github.com/bwya77/vscode-dark-islands) | ★3,571 | — | 2026-02-14 | | 3 | [HKUDS/ClawWork](https://github.com/HKUDS/ClawWork) | ★1,921 | Python | 2026-02-15 | | 4 | [xyzeva/k-id-age-verifier](https://github.com/xyzeva/k-id-age-verifier) | ★1,609 | TypeScript | 2026-02-11 | | 5 | [millionco/react-doctor](https://github.com/millionco/react-doctor) | ★1,325 | TypeScript | 2026-02-13 | | 6 | [RevylAI/greenlight](https://github.com/RevylAI/greenlight) | ★1,060 | Go | 2026-02-11 | | 7 | [vercel-labs/portless](https://github.com/vercel-labs/portless) | ★986 | TypeScript | 2026-02-15 | | 8 | [mickamy/sql-tap](https://github.com/mickamy/sql-tap) | ★888 | Go | 2026-02-14 | | 9 | [HKUDS/FastCode](https://github.com/HKUDS/FastCode) | ★820 | Python | 2026-02-13 | | 10 | [vigorX777/ai-daily-digest](https://github.com/vigorX777/ai-daily-digest) | ★756 | TypeScript | 2026-02-14 | --- ## Weekly Focus — Fastest Growing Top 10 ### 📈 #1 — google/langextract|Google Steps In to Solve LLM Structured Extraction > A Python library for extracting structured information from unstructured text using LLMs with precise source grounding and interactive visualization. **Weekly +6,121 ★|Total ★32,957|Python|Apache-2.0** [LangExtract](https://github.com/google/langextract) targets the most painful part of RAG pipelines: accurately extracting fields from unstructured text. The core selling point is "source grounding"—every extracted field can be traced back to its specific location in the original text, combined with an interactive visualization interface that makes manual verification intuitive. Supports Gemini API (gemini-flash, gemini-pro, etc.), has a PyPI package, and installs directly via `pip install langextract`. **Why it matters**: Google building its own library for structured extraction signifies that this need is fundamental and universal enough that even the model provider finds it worth creating tooling for. --- ### 📈 #2 🔁 — badlogic/pi-mono|Minimalist Coding Agent, Four Core Tools, 1k Token System Prompt > A TypeScript monorepo AI agent toolkit — coding agent CLI, unified LLM API, TUI library, vLLM pod manager. **Weekly +3,326 ★|Total ★13,327|TypeScript|MIT|🔁 Monthly Sustained Hit** [pi-mono](https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono) is a TypeScript monorepo by libGDX author Mario Zechner. Its core is a terminal coding agent CLI `pi`: just four core tools, a system prompt under 1,000 tokens, deliberately kept minimalist. The entire monorepo also includes a unified LLM API layer (`pi-ai`), a TUI library (`pi-tui`), Web UI components (`pi-web-ui`), and a vLLM pod manager (`pi-pods`). [Discussion on HN](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46631390) focuses on design philosophy: the author believes "what you leave out is more important than what you add," as well as pi's non-flickering TUI and turn rollback features. `pi` is also the underlying foundation for another AI coding tool in this week's Top New Repos. --- ### 📈 #3 🔁 — tambo-ai/tambo|Generative UI SDK, Double Hit on Weekly + Monthly Charts (HN 101 points) > Generative UI SDK for React **Weekly +2,540 ★|Total ★10,641|TypeScript|MIT|🔁 Monthly Sustained Hit** [Tambo](https://github.com/tambo-ai/tambo) allows AI agents to render corresponding React components directly based on conversation context, rather than just plain text responses. Version 1.0 scored [101 points on HN](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46966182), with engineers discussing the core question: "When should we use Generative UI, and when should we still stick to fixed components?" Trending for two consecutive weeks, the signal is stronger than a single-week spike. --- ### 📈 #4 — Jeffallan/claude-skills|66 Claude Code Skill Packs, AI Tool Plugin Market Takes Off > 66 Specialized Skills for Full-Stack Developers. Transform Claude Code into your expert pair programmer. **Weekly +2,461 ★|Total ★3,077|Python|MIT** [claude-skills](https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills) upgrades Claude Code from a general assistant to a "domain expert": security auditor, performance engineer, API designer... Each skill contains specialized system prompts and workflows. This points in the same direction as `anthropics/skills` and `openai/skills` appearing in monthly trends: **Agent skills are forming as an independent ecosystem**. --- ### 📈 #5 — danielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure|Persistent AI Assistant Infrastructure That Knows Your Habits > An open-source personalized AI platform that knows your goals, history, and preferences across every session. **Weekly +2,263 ★|Total ★8,730|TypeScript|MIT** [Personal_AI_Infrastructure](https://github.com/danielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure) is the new work from Fabric author Daniel Miessler. Unlike stateless chatbots, it uses the "TELOS system" to record user goals, habits, and history in 10 Markdown files (MISSION.md, GOALS.md, PROJECTS.md, etc.), with a three-layer memory architecture (hot/warm/cold) allowing every conversation to pick up where the last left off. Natively based on Claude Code's hook system, supports ElevenLabs voice output and Discord notifications. --- ### 📈 #6 🔁 — steipete/gogcli|Single CLI for Full Google Workspace Suite, Updated to v0.11 > A fast, script-friendly command-line interface for the full Google Workspace suite. **Weekly +2,144 ★|Total ★4,008|Go|🔁 Monthly Sustained Hit** [gogcli](https://github.com/steipete/gogcli) covers all Google Workspace services with a single binary named `gog`: Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Slides, Sheets, Forms, Apps Script, Contacts, Tasks, Chat, Classroom, Keep. Using JSON-first output, it fits scripts and AI agents; supports multi-account management, OS keyring secure storage, and command whitelisting for AI agent sandboxing. v0.11.0 (2026-02-15) added Apps Script and Forms command groups. Installable via `brew install steipete/tap/gogcli`. --- ### 📈 #7 — ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp|Official Chrome MCP Server, Letting AI Agents Directly Control Browsers > Official Chrome DevTools MCP server for AI coding agents to control and inspect a live Chrome browser. **Weekly +2,059 ★|Total ★25,839|TypeScript|Apache-2.0** [chrome-devtools-mcp](https://github.com/ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp) is the official MCP server from the Google Chrome DevTools team, allowing AI coding agents like Claude, Gemini, Cursor, and Copilot to directly control and inspect the browser via the Chrome DevTools Protocol. 26 tools cover input automation, navigation, performance analysis, network monitoring, and console debugging; underpinned by Puppeteer, launchable via `npx chrome-devtools-mcp`. There have been [multiple HN discussions](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45401756), with criticism focused on "essentially a Puppeteer wrapper where the agent only sees the accessibility tree"; Addy Osmani defended it in a blog post as "eyes" for AI agents. --- ### 📈 #8 — github/gh-aw|GitHub Officially Pushes "Continuous AI" into CI/CD (HN 302 points) > GitHub Agentic Workflows — actions, cai, ci, claude-code, codex, copilot **Weekly +1,872 ★|Total ★3,107|Go|MIT** [gh-aw](https://github.com/github/gh-aw) is an official GitHub gh CLI extension that lets AI agents (one of GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, or OpenAI Codex) handle repo tasks directly in Actions workflows: code review, PR generation, issue triage, test fixing. GitHub calls this concept "continuous AI (cAI)". [HN 302 points, 142 comments](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46934107)—concentrated on two issues: the authorization boundary of AI agents in CI/CD (who approves the AI merge?), and whether this will make junior dev PR review work disappear. --- ### 📈 #9 — p-e-w/heretic|Automatic Removal of Model Safety Alignment Using Directional Ablation (HN Buzz) > Automatic, fully parametrized censorship removal for transformer-based language models without retraining. **Weekly +1,778 ★|Total ★7,646|Python|AGPL-3.0** [heretic](https://github.com/p-e-w/heretic) uses "directional ablation" combined with Optuna TPE parameter optimizer to automatically adjust direction vectors in each layer without retraining, minimizing refusal responses while minimizing KL divergence from the original model. Supports dense models, multimodal models, and multiple MoE architectures, supports bitsandbytes quantization to reduce VRAM requirements. There are already over 1,000 community derivative models based on heretic on Hugging Face. [HN Discussion (Nov 2025)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45945587): The technical route is considered quite ingenious; discussion is split into two camps—where to draw the line between "removing political censorship" and "removing safety guardrails"? --- ### 📈 #10 — steipete/summarize|Universal Content Summarizer for CLI + Chrome Side Panel > Summarize any URL, YouTube video, podcast, PDF, audio/video file, or RSS feed from CLI or browser sidebar. **Weekly +1,628 ★|Total ★3,598|TypeScript** [summarize](https://github.com/steipete/summarize) is another open source tool from gogcli author Peter Steinberger: CLI supports URL, YouTube, Podcast, PDF, audio/video, RSS; Chrome Side Panel version (v0.11+) adds streaming conversation agents and history recording. Video summarization includes slide extraction—OCR + timestamped screenshot cards. Prioritizes published captions, with Whisper as fallback. Supports OpenAI-compatible local endpoints and OpenRouter. Installable via `brew install` (macOS arm64). --- ## Weekly Focus — Top New Repos Top 10 ### 🆕 New #1 — zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw|5 Days ★11,846, New High for Rust AI Assistant Framework > Fast, small, and fully autonomous AI assistant infrastructure — deploy anywhere, swap anything 🦀 **★11,846|Rust|Created 2026-02-13** [zeroclaw](https://github.com/zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw) amassed nearly 12k stars within 5 days of creation, with 1,189 forks. Design philosophy is "Zero Overhead + Fully Autonomous + Swappable Components"—models, memory backends, and tool layers are all hot-pluggable, deployable on cloud or edge devices. It is the Rust-based AI assistant framework with the highest star count at birth so far. --- ### 🆕 New #2 — bwya77/vscode-dark-islands|Bringing JetBrains Islands Dark Visual Style to VS Code > A dark VS Code color theme replicating JetBrains' Islands Dark: floating glass panels, rounded corners, smooth animations. **★3,571|PowerShell + Shell|MIT|Created 2026-02-14** [vscode-dark-islands](https://github.com/bwya77/vscode-dark-islands) replicates the visual language of the Islands Dark theme launched by JetBrains in September 2025, using a Custom UI Style extension to inject CSS for floating glass panels and rounded corner effects that exceed standard theme limits. Includes one-click install scripts (Unix/macOS and Windows), defaulting to IBM Plex Mono (editor) + FiraCode Nerd Font (terminal). Zero to 3,500+ stars in a week, driven mainly by developer community social media spread. --- ### 🆕 New #3 — HKUDS/ClawWork|Evaluating AI Agent "Real Workplace Productivity" with $10 Simulation (HN Buzz) > Economic benchmark: give an AI agent $10 and 44 occupational tasks — measure real income earned per token spent. **★1,921|Python|MIT|Created 2026-02-15** [ClawWork](https://github.com/HKUDS/ClawWork) is an AI agent economic evaluation framework from the HKUDS lab at HKU (same team as LightRAG). Agents are given $10 simulated funds and 220 real occupational tasks (GDPVal dataset, covering 44 economic sectors), earning income by task quality and paying by token consumption—forcing agents to make strategic trade-offs between "doing tasks now" and "investing in learning first". Comes with a React + WebSocket real-time economic dashboard, supporting multi-model arenas like GPT-4o and Claude. [HN Discussion](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47040439): The evaluation framework design is considered closer to actual deployment scenarios than traditional benchmarks, though some question the reliability of LLM quality assessment. --- ### 🆕 New #4 — xyzeva/k-id-age-verifier|Discord, Twitch, Snapchat Age Verification Bypass Tool (HN Discussion) > Automates age verification on platforms using k-id by replicating its AES-GCM encrypted facial metadata payload. **★1,609|TypeScript|Created 2026-02-11** [k-id-age-verifier](https://github.com/xyzeva/k-id-age-verifier) generates legitimate-looking facial metadata payloads by replicating the AES-GCM encryption protocol of k-id (facial recognition age verification service used by Discord, Twitch, Kick, Quora, Snapchat), without needing actual face scans. Currently in an "attack and defense" loop with k-id—k-id has patched multiple times, and maintainers continue to update bypass methods. [HN 302 points discussion](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46982421) and 404 Media reporting focus on a core issue: **When age verification is tied to biometrics (face scans), who protects user privacy data?** The technology itself is neutral, but it has sparked broad discussion on the legality of platforms mandating biometric collection. --- ### 🆕 New #5 — millionco/react-doctor|Let AI Agents Be Your React Doctor > Let coding agents diagnose and fix your React code **★1,325|TypeScript|MIT|Created 2026-02-13** The Million.js team (authors of the famous React performance optimization package) launched [react-doctor](https://github.com/millionco/react-doctor), allowing AI agents to automatically diagnose React code issues: component performance, incorrect hook usage, accessibility, etc. Topics include `skill`, designed as an agent skill to be directly integrated into workflows like Claude Code. --- ### 🆕 New #6 — RevylAI/greenlight|Compliance Scanner Before iOS App Store Submission > Pre-submission compliance scanner for iOS apps: detect common App Store rejection reasons before you submit. **★1,060|Go|MIT|Created 2026-02-11** [greenlight](https://github.com/RevylAI/greenlight) lets iOS developers run `greenlight preflight` before App Store submission, running four scanners in parallel: 30+ code pattern detections (private API calls, hardcoded secrets, payment bypass, missing ATT prompt), privacy manifest verification (`PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy`), compiled IPA file analysis, and App Store Connect API remote metadata confirmation. Outputs JSON and JUnit format, CI/CD friendly; supports Claude Code and Codex skill integration for automatic issue fixing. --- ### 🆕 New #7 — vercel-labs/portless|.localhost Named URLs Designed for Humans and Agents > Replace port numbers with stable, named .localhost URLs. For humans and agents. **★986|TypeScript|Apache-2.0|Created 2026-02-15** [portless](https://github.com/vercel-labs/portless) replaces port number URLs like `localhost:3000` with stable `myapp.localhost`, so AI agents calling local services don't need to memorize port numbers or break chains due to restarts. From Vercel Labs, the description specifically emphasizes "For humans and agents"—agent reachability in local development environments is starting to be taken seriously by major players. --- ### 🆕 New #8 — mickamy/sql-tap|Biggest Surprise of the Week: Pure Engineering Tool Hits HN 231 Points Amidst AI Wave > Watch SQL traffic in real-time with a TUI **★888|Go|MIT|Created 2026-02-14** [sql-tap](https://github.com/mickamy/sql-tap) is a terminal TUI tool written in Go that intercepts and displays PostgreSQL and MySQL SQL query traffic in real-time without modifying application code. Scored [231 points and 44 comments](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47011567) on HN on its creation day. This is particularly conspicuous in a week trending with AI agent tools. Discussion focused on: lighter than pgAdmin's query analysis, more focused than Wireshark, especially useful for debugging N+1 problems and slow queries. **Pure engineering problem, zero AI packaging, and it exploded just like that.** --- ### 🆕 New #9 — HKUDS/FastCode|Claims Codebase Understanding Framework 3-4x Faster, 44-55% Cheaper than Cursor, Claude Code > Token-efficient framework for code understanding in large codebases: hierarchical indexing + semantic search + relationship graphs. **★820|Python|MIT|Created 2026-02-13** [FastCode](https://github.com/HKUDS/FastCode) also comes from the HKUDS lab, targeting Q&A and navigation tasks for large codebases. Three-stage architecture: hierarchical code indexing (file → class → function → documentation), semantic structured representation (embedding + BM25), relationship graph modeling (call graph, dependency graph, inheritance graph). Supports AST parsing for 8+ languages, offers Web UI, REST API, and CLI interfaces. The paper claims to outperform Cursor and Claude Code on benchmarks like SWE-QA, but independent verification is pending community follow-up. --- ### 🆕 New #10 — vigorX777/ai-daily-digest|Zero-Dependency Bun Script, AI Curates 90 Top Tech Blogs Daily > Zero-dependency TypeScript/Bun script that scrapes 90 curated tech blogs, AI-scores articles, and generates a structured daily Markdown digest with trend analysis. **★756|TypeScript|Created 2026-02-14** [ai-daily-digest](https://github.com/vigorX777/ai-daily-digest) scrapes 90 top tech blogs from Andrej Karpathy's curated list (10-way concurrency, 15s timeout), uses AI to score and filter from three dimensions, and generates a daily Markdown digest containing Mermaid pie charts, ASCII bar charts, and translated Chinese titles. Six article categories: AI/ML, Security, Engineering, Tools/Open Source, Opinions, Other. AI backend supports Gemini API and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (including DeepSeek). Pure TypeScript single file, no third-party dependencies, runs on Bun native `fetch`. --- ## Monthly Trend Comparison Three projects in this week's weekly list also appearing in monthly trends (🔁): | Project | +Stars This Week | Monthly Rank Direction | Sustained Theme | |------|-----------|------------|---------| | badlogic/pi-mono | +3,326 | Monthly Sustained Hit | AI agent toolkit full stack | | tambo-ai/tambo | +2,540 | Monthly Sustained Hit | Generative UI | | steipete/gogcli | +2,144 | Monthly Sustained Hit | Google Suite CLI | Other notable signals in monthly trends: `anthropics/skills` and `openai/skills` are both in monthly trends, echoing this week's `claude-skills` breakout—**"AI Skills Market" is one of the strongest recurring themes this month**. --- ## Weekly Trend Insights **1. Officialization of AI Toolchains**: The three most important signals this week come from big companies stepping in—Google (LangExtract), Google Chrome Team (chrome-devtools-mcp), GitHub Official (gh-aw). AI tools are no longer just a community playground; platforms are building "official channels". **2. Skills as the New App Store for AI Agents**: claude-skills (+2,461), anthropics/skills, and openai/skills all in monthly trends, plus nicobailon/visual-explainer and MooseGoose0701/skill-compose—"Pluggable Skill Packs" are becoming the distribution format for this generation of AI agent applications. **3. The Counterattack of Backend Tools**: sql-tap (HN 231 points) reminds us: real engineering problems always have a market. In a weekly trend dominated by AI agent tools, a pure SQL monitoring tool breaking out on engineering quality and clear problem definition is the most thought-provoking contrast this week. --- ## AI Textbook Automation Workflow for Developers: Claude Code + Pandoc URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/ai-textbook-automation-developers Date: 2026-02-17 Tools: Claude Code, Pandoc, Python, ebooklib, weasyprint, Calibre (Optional) Concepts: Automated Workflow, EPUB Generation, Markdown Conversion, EdTech, Version Control ### Summary Build a fully controllable textbook generation pipeline using Claude Code, Pandoc, and Python. From Markdown to EPUB/PDF, supporting version control, custom CSS, and automated deployment. Includes real-world case study: nihongo-claude. ### Content # AI Textbook Automation Workflow for Developers: Claude Code + Pandoc You used ChatGPT to generate a complete course syllabus, excitedly pasted the content into Google Docs, spent 45 minutes adjusting heading formats, fixing the table of contents, and unifying font sizes—only to spot a major error in Chapter 3 that requires a rewrite. You regenerate, copy-paste again, and adjust formatting again. This loop repeats every time you produce a new textbook. This is the hidden cost of no-code tools: **formatting time often exceeds content generation time**. Even worse, without version control, you don't know what changed last time; without batch automation, ten textbooks mean manual operations ten times. If you have basic knowledge of Python and command line, this article shows you how to build a **"set once, use forever"** automation pipeline: Claude Code Generation → Markdown Management → Pandoc Conversion → EPUB/PDF Output. > **🚀 If you don't want to code**: If you just want to quickly try AI textbook generation without version control or batch automation, check out the [No-Code AI Textbook Generator Guide](/posts/ai-textbook-generator-no-code). That path only takes 1-2 hours with zero coding, and you can always come back here to upgrade to the developer workflow. --- ## TL;DR > **📌 Key Takeaways** > > - **Problem**: No-code tools lack version control, automation, and batch generation support. > - **Solution**: Claude Code + Markdown + Pandoc + Python automation pipeline. > - **Core Advantages**: Full format control, Git version management, reusable scripts. > - **Time Investment**: Initial setup approx. 2-4 hours, then 1-2 hours per new textbook. > - **Cost**: Claude Pro ($20/mo, optional); Pandoc, Python, Git are free. > - **Who is this for**: Developers familiar with CLI, technical writers, power users needing batch generation or customization. > - **Real Case**: [nihongo-claude](https://github.com/chiweitw/nihongo-claude) — An N3 Japanese learning material planned and generated by Claude Code based on requirements. --- ## When to Choose the Developer Workflow? Before starting, confirm if this path suits you. **Choose the developer workflow if you**: - ✅ Need version control — want to track changes or revert to previous versions. - ✅ Plan to generate multiple textbooks — want reusable scripts. - ✅ Want full format control — custom CSS, EPUB metadata, cover images. - ✅ Prefer CLI tools and are familiar with basic Python or Shell Script. - ✅ Need automated deployment — e.g., auto-regenerate EPUB on every Git commit. **Do not choose this path if**: - ❌ Just want to quickly generate one textbook (one-off project). - ❌ Don't want to touch the terminal or write any scripts. - ❌ Have limited time and want a finished product today. > **⚠️ Cost Warning**: The developer path has higher upfront investment. If you only need a textbook occasionally, the ROI of the [No-Code Solution](/posts/ai-textbook-generator-no-code) is usually higher. This article assumes you are familiar with Git, Markdown, and CLI operations. --- ## System Architecture: From Requirements to eBook The entire pipeline has only three core steps: ``` Learning Requirements ↓ Claude Code (Plan Course Structure + Generate Markdown Content) ↓ Markdown Files (Git Version Control) ↓ Pandoc (Conversion) ├──→ EPUB (Primary format, for all modern ebook readers) ├──→ PDF (Print / Tablet reading) └──→ MOBI (Optional, only for pre-2021 Kindles) ``` **Important Notes on Tool Selection**: - **Pandoc** is the workhorse, generating high-quality EPUB directly; sufficient for most cases. - **Calibre** is optional, only needed if you require MOBI format (old Kindles); new Kindles (2022+) accept EPUB (Amazon auto-converts to their proprietary format), so you can skip Calibre. - **AI Tool Flexibility**: This article uses Claude Code as an example, but the workflow applies equally to ChatGPT API, Gemini API, or other LLMs — use what you're comfortable with. ### Technical Requirements | Tool | Necessity | Installation | |------|-----------|--------------| | Git | ✅ Required | System built-in or `brew install git` | | Python 3.8+ | ✅ Required | python.org or `brew install python` | | Pandoc | ✅ Required | `brew install pandoc` / `apt install pandoc` | | Claude Code CLI | ✅ Recommended | `curl -fsSL https://claude.ai/install.sh | bash` (macOS/Linux) or `brew install --cask claude-code` | | Calibre | ❌ Optional | `brew install calibre` (Only if MOBI is needed) | --- ## Step 1: generating Structured Content with Claude Code ### Why Claude Code instead of Web UI? Claude.ai web UI is great for interactive chat, but has limitations for textbook generation: - **Inconvenient Output**: Requires manual copy-pasting to text editor. - **No File Access**: Web UI cannot control local filesystem. - **Limited Context**: Maintaining consistency across chapters is harder. Claude Code (Local CLI) solves these problems: - Runs directly in your project directory, generated Markdown files are saved locally automatically. - Can read your `outline.md` and reference materials, maintaining consistent style. - Integrates naturally with Git workflow. ### Setup Project Directory ```bash # Create project mkdir my-textbook && cd my-textbook git init # Create basic directory structure mkdir -p chapters assets output scripts # Initialize Python environment (Recommended) python3 -m venv venv source venv/bin/activate pip install ebooklib markdown2 weasyprint ``` ### Create Course Outline (Let AI Plan Structure) This is the core difference of the developer path: **You don't need prepared materials**. Just describe your learning needs and let Claude Code plan the entire course structure. Create `REQUIREMENTS.md`: ```markdown # Learning Requirements ## What I Want to Learn Data Analysis Introduction (Product Manager Perspective) ## My Background - Current Role: Software Engineer, transitioned to PM 6 months ago - Known: Python basics, basic SQL queries - Weakness: Statistics concepts, A/B test design, Data visualization ## Learning Goals After completion, be able to: 1. Independently design A/B tests and interpret results 2. Analyze user behavior funnels using GA4 3. Create clear data visualizations for non-tech audiences ## Course Specs - Chapters: 8-10 - Length per chapter: Approx. 1,500-2,000 words - Language: English - Example Context: SaaS products, E-commerce platforms ``` ### Let Claude Code Plan the Course Structure Start Claude Code in the project directory: ```bash claude ``` After Claude Code starts, enter the following command: ``` Please read REQUIREMENTS.md, then: 1. Design an 8-10 chapter course structure, save to outline.md 2. Each chapter includes: learning objectives, core concepts (3-5), real case topics, self-check quiz (3 questions) 3. Ensure difficulty progresses logically, suitable for learners with Python/SQL basics but weak statistics ``` Claude Code will automatically read requirements, plan the structure, and write `outline.md` to your directory. ### Generate Content Chapter by Chapter After verifying the structure, let Claude Code generate each chapter: ``` Please generate the complete content for Chapter 1 based on the structure in outline.md. Formatting requirements: - Use Markdown format - H2 for chapter main title, H3 for sections - Attach a real SaaS product case for each core concept - End with 3 self-check questions (with answers) Save result to chapters/chapter-01.md ``` Repeat this step to complete all chapters. Git commit after finishing each chapter: ```bash git add chapters/chapter-01.md git commit -m "feat: add chapter 1 - data-driven decision framework" ``` > **💡 Quality Control Tip**: After generating each chapter, ask Claude Code to do a "Reverse Review" — ask it to point out potential errors, unclear points, or oversimplifications in the chapter. This is more efficient than manual proofreading. If you are interested in more applications of Claude Code in software development, check out the [Claude Code PRD Workflow](/posts/claude-code-prd-workflow). --- ## Step 2: Pandoc Conversion — From Markdown to EPUB Pandoc is the core conversion tool of this pipeline. It's open-source, free, supports dozens of formats, CLI-friendly, and perfect for automation. ### Simplest Conversion Command Check if Pandoc is installed correctly: ```bash pandoc --version ``` Basic conversion: ```bash pandoc chapters/chapter-01.md -o output/textbook.epub \ --toc \ --metadata title="Data Analysis 101: PM Guide" ``` In seconds, you have an EPUB readable on any ebook reader. ### Complete Production-Grade Conversion Command In a real project, you need more parameters: ```bash pandoc \ chapters/chapter-*.md \ -o output/my-textbook.epub \ --toc \ --toc-depth=2 \ --epub-cover-image=assets/cover.jpg \ --css=assets/styles.css \ --metadata title="Data Analysis 101: PM Guide" \ --metadata author="Your Name" \ --metadata lang=en \ --metadata date="2026-02-17" ``` **Parameter Explanation**: | Parameter | Usage | |-----------|-------| | `--toc` | Generate Table of Contents | | `--toc-depth=2` | TOC Depth (H1 and H2) | | `--epub-cover-image` | Cover Image (1600×2560 px optimal) | | `--css` | Custom layout styles | | `--metadata lang=en` | Set language (affects font rendering) | ### Custom CSS Layout Create `assets/styles.css` to give your textbook a professional look: ```css /* Basic Layout */ body { font-family: "Noto Sans", "Source Sans Pro", sans-serif; line-height: 1.8; color: #333; max-width: 680px; margin: 0 auto; } /* Chapter Titles */ h1 { color: #2c3e50; border-bottom: 3px solid #3498db; padding-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 2em; } h2 { color: #34495e; margin-top: 1.8em; } /* Code Blocks */ pre { background: #f8f9fa; padding: 16px; border-radius: 6px; overflow-x: auto; font-size: 0.9em; } code { background: #f0f0f0; padding: 2px 6px; border-radius: 3px; font-size: 0.9em; } /* Blockquotes */ blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #3498db; margin-left: 0; padding: 10px 20px; background: #ecf9ff; border-radius: 0 6px 6px 0; } /* Tables */ table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin: 1.5em 0; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 10px 14px; text-align: left; } th { background: #f2f4f7; font-weight: 600; } ``` ### Batch Automation Script Create `scripts/convert.sh` for one-click generation of all formats: ```bash #!/bin/bash # Configuration TITLE="Data Analysis 101: PM Guide" AUTHOR="Your Name" OUTPUT_DIR="output" COVER="assets/cover.jpg" CSS="assets/styles.css" # Ensure output dir exists mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR" echo "🔄 Starting conversion..." # Convert to EPUB (Primary format) pandoc chapters/chapter-*.md \ -o "${OUTPUT_DIR}/textbook.epub" \ --toc --toc-depth=2 \ --epub-cover-image="$COVER" \ --css="$CSS" \ --metadata title="$TITLE" \ --metadata author="$AUTHOR" \ --metadata lang=en echo "✅ EPUB generated: ${OUTPUT_DIR}/textbook.epub" # Convert to PDF (via HTML intermediate) pandoc chapters/chapter-*.md \ -o "${OUTPUT_DIR}/textbook.html" \ --standalone \ --css="$CSS" \ --metadata title="$TITLE" python3 -m weasyprint "${OUTPUT_DIR}/textbook.html" "${OUTPUT_DIR}/textbook.pdf" rm "${OUTPUT_DIR}/textbook.html" echo "✅ PDF generated: ${OUTPUT_DIR}/textbook.pdf" echo "" echo "📂 Output Directory:" ls -lh "${OUTPUT_DIR}/" ``` Execute: ```bash chmod +x scripts/convert.sh ./scripts/convert.sh ``` Output Structure: ``` output/ ├── textbook.epub ← E-reader (Primary) └── textbook.pdf ← Print / Tablet ``` --- ## Step 3 (Optional): Calibre — Only for Kindle MOBI > **⚠️ Note**: Most users **DO NOT** need this step. **When do you need Calibre?** | Device | Supported Formats | Need Calibre? | |--------|-------------------|---------------| | Kindle Paperwhite (Post-2022) | ✅ Accepts EPUB (Auto-convert) | ❌ No | | Kobo, Apple Books, Google Play | ✅ Supports EPUB | ❌ No | | Browser Reading (Tablet) | ✅ Supports EPUB/PDF | ❌ No | | Old Kindle (Pre-2021) | ❌ Only MOBI | ✅ Yes | Only install Calibre and run the following if your readers use old Kindles: ```bash # Install Calibre brew install calibre # macOS sudo apt install calibre # Linux # EPUB → MOBI Conversion ebook-convert output/textbook.epub output/textbook.mobi \ --output-profile kindle ``` **Conclusion**: Unless you have specific needs, simply generating EPUB with Pandoc is sufficient. No need to introduce extra tool dependencies. --- ## Case Study: nihongo-claude — Requirements-Driven Material Generation [nihongo-claude](https://github.com/chiweitw/nihongo-claude) is an open-source project and a real implementation of this workflow. It best illustrates the core advantage of the "developer path." ### Key Features: From Scratch, Requirements-Driven **Biggest difference from general AI textbook tools**: This project started with **zero prepared materials** — no PDF, no notes, no syllabus. The process went like this: 1. **Define Requirements**: "I want to learn N3 Japanese, currently at N4 level, aim to reach N3 in 3 months." 2. **Claude Code Plans Structure**: AI automatically designed a complete course structure with 4 phases and 30 lessons. 3. **Generate Content**: Each lesson includes vocabulary, grammar, real conversation scenarios, and quizzes. 4. **Automated Output**: Python script + Pandoc one-click EPUB/PDF generation. This verifies a key hypothesis: **You don't need to be a Japanese teacher to generate reasonably structured Japanese materials** — providing you can clearly define learning needs and quality standards. ### Project Structure ``` nihongo-claude/ ├── REQUIREMENTS.md # Requirements definition ├── lessons/ │ ├── phase-1/ # Phase 1: Basic Grammar (L1-8) │ │ ├── lesson-01.md │ │ ├── lesson-02.md │ │ └── ... │ ├── phase-2/ # Phase 2: Advanced Grammar (L9-16) │ ├── phase-3/ # Phase 3: Context Application (L17-24) │ └── phase-4/ # Phase 4: Mock Exams (L25-30) ├── scripts/ │ ├── convert_to_epub.py # Python EPUB script │ ├── generate_pdf.py # PDF generation script │ └── quick-convert.sh # One-click script ├── assets/ │ ├── styles.css # Custom CSS │ └── cover.jpg # Cover image └── output/ ├── nihongo-n3.epub └── nihongo-n3.pdf ``` ### Core Script Analysis **1. `convert_to_epub.py` — Python EPUB Generation** ```python import glob from ebooklib import epub import markdown2 def build_epub(): book = epub.EpubBook() book.set_identifier('nihongo-n3-v1') book.set_title('Japanese N3 Complete Guide') book.set_language('ja') book.add_author('Your Name') chapters = [] lesson_files = sorted(glob.glob('lessons/**/*.md', recursive=True)) for i, lesson_path in enumerate(lesson_files, start=1): with open(lesson_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f: md_content = f.read() # Markdown → HTML html_content = markdown2.markdown(md_content, extras=['tables', 'fenced-code-blocks']) # Create EPUB Chapter chapter = epub.EpubHtml( title=f'Lesson {i:02d}', file_name=f'lesson_{i:02d}.xhtml', lang='ja' ) chapter.content = f'
{html_content}' book.add_item(chapter) chapters.append(chapter) # Set TOC and Nav book.toc = chapters book.spine = ['nav'] + chapters book.add_item(epub.EpubNcx()) book.add_item(epub.EpubNav()) epub.write_epub('output/nihongo-n3.epub', book) print('✅ EPUB generated: output/nihongo-n3.epub') if __name__ == '__main__': build_epub() ``` **2. `quick-convert.sh` — Interactive One-Click Script** ```bash #!/bin/bash echo "Select output format:" echo "1) EPUB (Recommended)" echo "2) PDF" echo "3) All" read -p "Enter option (1-3): " choice case $choice in 1) python3 scripts/convert_to_epub.py ;; 2) python3 scripts/generate_pdf.py ;; 3) python3 scripts/convert_to_epub.py python3 scripts/generate_pdf.py echo "✅ All formats generated" ;; *) echo "❌ Invalid option" exit 1 ;; esac ``` ### Three Lessons from nihongo-claude **1. Requirements Definition Determines Content Quality** It's not about the AI tool, but how you describe requirements. "I want to learn Japanese" vs "I am N4 level, aim to pass N3 in 3 months, 1 hour daily study, need emphasis on listening and reading" — these generate disparate quality materials. **2. Modular Design Makes Maintenance Easy** Saving each lesson as an independent Markdown file means: - Finding an error requires modifying only one file, not affecting others. - Can A/B test different teaching methods (using Git branches). - Adding new courses just means adding Markdown files; the script includes them automatically. **3. This Pipeline Applies to Any Topic** You can Fork this repo, modify `REQUIREMENTS.md` with your own learning needs, and let Claude Code plan a new course structure — whether it's machine learning, financial analysis, or product management, the pipeline is identical. --- ## Advanced: GitHub Actions for Full Automation If your textbook needs continuous updates (e.g., tracking tech changes), set up a CI/CD pipeline: GitHub automatically regenerates EPUB/PDF on every Markdown update commit. Create `.github/workflows/build-ebook.yml`: ```yaml name: Build eBook on: push: branches: [main] paths: - 'chapters/**' - 'assets/**' jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Setup Python uses: actions/setup-python@v4 with: python-version: '3.11' - name: Install Pandoc run: | sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install -y pandoc - name: Install Python dependencies run: pip install ebooklib markdown2 weasyprint - name: Generate EPUB run: python scripts/convert_to_epub.py - name: Generate PDF run: | pandoc chapters/chapter-*.md \ -o output/textbook.html \ --standalone --css=assets/styles.css \ --metadata title="My Textbook" python3 -m weasyprint output/textbook.html output/textbook.pdf rm output/textbook.html - name: Upload artifacts uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: ebooks path: output/ - name: Create Release (on tag) if: startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/') uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2 with: files: output/* ``` **Usage**: 1. Modify Markdown content in `chapters/`. 2. `git commit && git push`. 3. GitHub Actions runs automatically, generating new EPUB/PDF versions. 4. For formal release, tag it: `git tag v1.1.0 && git push --tags`. 5. GitHub automatically creates a Release with download links. > **💡 Pro Tip**: Add a Markdown linter (e.g., `markdownlint`) in GitHub Actions to ensure every commit meets formatting standards, preventing conversion errors. --- ## Risks & Limitations ### Technical Complexity - **Learning Curve**: Requires familiarity with CLI, Git, and basic Python. Setup might take half a day for beginners. - **Debugging**: EPUB format issues (CSS incompatibility, image paths) can be hard to trace. - **Pandoc Versions**: Slight parameter differences between versions; upgrades need testing. ### Tool Dependencies - **Python Package Conflicts**: `ebooklib`, `weasyprint` might conflict; use `venv`. - **EPUB Compatibility**: CSS support varies by reader; test on multiple devices. - **weasyprint Fonts**: Chinese PDFs need font installation (e.g., Noto Sans CJK) to avoid tofu boxes (missing characters). ### Cost Considerations - **Claude Pro Subscription**: For mass generation of high-quality content, Claude Pro ($20/mo) offers higher limits than free tier; ChatGPT Plus or Gemini Advanced are alternatives. - **Dev Time**: Initial setup takes 2-4 hours more than no-code, but it's a one-time investment. - **GitHub Actions Limits**: 2,000 free minutes/month (generating a book takes <10 mins). ### When NOT to Use This Path > **⚠️ Honestly**: If you just want to generate one textbook, the upfront effort here is likely not worth it. The [No-Code Solution](/posts/ai-textbook-generator-no-code) can finish the first book today with zero setup. Come back here when you confirm the need for mass generation or version control. --- ## FAQ **Q1: How much Python knowledge do I need?** A: Basics — variable, loop, function. You can copy nihongo-claude scripts and just modify paths, title,/author metadata. Advanced customization (EPUB structure, interactivity) requires `ebooklib` API knowledge. **Q2: Pandoc or Python ebooklib?** A: Depends on needs: - **Pandoc**: Simpler, one command, limited but usually sufficient CSS. **Recommended for beginners.** - **ebooklib (Python)**: Full control over EPUB structure (chapter order, metadata, nav), for advanced customization. Recommendation: Start with Pandoc prototypes, switch to Python for granular control. **Q3: Is the EPUB consistent across readers?** A: EPUB is standard, but CSS support varies: - **Kindle**: Limited CSS, avoid flexbox/grid/complex animations. - **Apple Books, Kobo**: Better CSS support. - **Advice**: Use conservative CSS (fonts, colors, basic spacing), test on multiple devices. **Q4: Images and Tables?** A: - **Images**: Put in `assets/images/`, use relative paths in Markdown ``, Pandoc embeds them automatically. - **Tables**: Standard Markdown syntax, Pandoc handles it. - **Complex Charts**: Export as images and embed to avoid HTML/CSS table layout issues. **Q5: Can I replace Claude Code with ChatGPT/Gemini?** A: Absolutely. This article uses Claude Code as `nihongo-claude` used it. But the core is **Markdown Files + Pandoc**. Any AI that outputs Markdown works: - **ChatGPT** (OpenAI): Similar function via GPT-4 API or Web. - **Gemini** (Google): Free tier is powerful, `gemini-2.0-flash` is fast. - **Any LLM API**: Anything outputting Markdown fits this pipeline. If interested in advanced multi-AI collaboration, check [Multi-AI Collaboration Workflow](/posts/multi-ai-collaboration-workflow). **Q6: How to batch generate textbooks for multiple topics?** A: Create templated scripts, with independent directory and `REQUIREMENTS.md` per topic: ```bash # generate-textbook.sh TOPIC="$1" mkdir -p "projects/${TOPIC}/chapters" cp REQUIREMENTS_TEMPLATE.md "projects/${TOPIC}/REQUIREMENTS.md" echo "Edit projects/${TOPIC}/REQUIREMENTS.md then run claude in that dir" ``` Each topic is an independent Git project. **Q7: Is this good for technical documentation?** A: Yes. The same workflow suits: - **API Doc Collections**: Combine multiple MDs into PDF API docs. - **Internal Knowledge Base**: Turn Notion/Confluence exports into ebooks. - **Tech Blog Compilations**: Merge related articles into a topical ebook. --- ## Conclusion: Build Your Textbook Factory If you've reached here, you now possess: 1. **Claude Code Gen Workflow**: Requirements → Plan → Generate, AI-assisted. 2. **Pandoc Conversion Pipeline**: Markdown → EPUB/PDF, one command. 3. **Version Control Integration**: Git tracking, revertible, collaborative. 4. **Optional CI/CD**: Auto-generate on commit. The real value isn't "generating a book," but **reusability**: The script and workflow you build work for the next book, just changing requirements and metadata. **Suggested Start**: 1. Fork [nihongo-claude](https://github.com/chiweitw/nihongo-claude) → Study structure. 2. Modify `REQUIREMENTS.md` for your learning needs. 3. Start Claude Code to plan the course. 4. Run `./scripts/quick-convert.sh` to generate your first EPUB. 5. Open in a reader and feel the accomplishment of "self-generated." > **💡 Final Reminder**: Tools are means, content quality is the end. Regardless of the AI tool, manual review, fact-checking, and personalization are essential. AI is a powerful assistant, but judging what knowledge is valuable relies on you. --- If you haven't tried AI textbook generation, start with the [No-Code Version](/posts/ai-textbook-generator-no-code) — finish your first book today. Come back to build this automation system once familiar. The two paths complement, not compete. --- ## No-Code AI Personal Textbook: The Complete Learner's Guide URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/ai-textbook-generator-no-code Date: 2026-02-17 Tools: NotebookLM, Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, Youbooks, TailoredRead, Type.ai, Raptor Write, Mistral le Chat Concepts: Personalized Learning, AI Education Tools, No-Code, Knowledge Management ### Summary Turn your research notes, PDFs, and web articles into a fully structured personal textbook using AI—without writing a single line of code. Complete workflow, ready in 1-2 hours. ### Content # No-Code AI Personal Textbook: The Complete Learner's Guide You just spent $60 on a data analysis textbook, excitedly opened the first chapter, only to find the first three chapters covering Excel basics you already know. Skip to Chapter 5, and the examples are all financial case studies, but you're a product manager who needs practical applications for user behavior analysis. By Chapter 10, you realize the content is too advanced and completely unusable. You're not alone. Traditional textbooks are designed for the "average student," filled with content that doesn't fit your background or goals. The result? You use only 30% of the content but pay 100% of the price. There's a better way. With AI tools, you can transform messy research notes, PDF documents, and web articles into a fully personalized textbook that fits your needs perfectly in just **1-2 hours**—**without writing any code**. Want to learn "Business Japanese for Tech Conferences"? AI can generate a complete course with realistic dialogues, vocabulary lists, and self-quizzes, tailored specifically to your professional background and learning goals. This article guides you through a complete no-code workflow, from gathering materials to generating PDF or EPUB textbooks. All tools have web interfaces; you only need to copy-paste and click buttons to build your exclusive learning materials. > **📌 TL;DR** > > - **Problem**: Traditional textbooks are expensive, irrelevant to personal needs, used only 30% but paid 100%. > - **Solution**: Use NotebookLM (organize materials) + AI Tools (Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini) + Book Generation Platforms to build personal textbooks without code. > - **Time**: 1-2 hours for a basic version, 4-6 hours for a refined version. > - **Cost**: Completely free combinations available (NotebookLM + Gemini + Raptor Write), advanced features ~$10-20/month. > - **Who**: Learners, educators, content creators—anyone wanting customized learning materials without coding. --- ## Why Personalized Textbooks? ### Three Problems with Traditional Textbooks **1. Redundant Content Wastes Time** Studies show learners use only 30-40% of textbook content on average. Early chapters often cover basics you know; middle chapters may be irrelevant to your context; later chapters are too advanced. This "one-size-fits-all" design forces you to waste time on irrelevant operational content. **2. Lack of Personalized Context** Textbook examples are usually generic. A software engineer learning statistics sees bank credit risk models; a product manager wanting data analysis gets only financial market cases. You need "how to analyze user retention" or "statistical significance in A/B testing," not abstract examples unrelated to your work. **3. Expensive and Unupdatable** Professional textbooks average $150-250. Once bought, if content doesn't fit, you're stuck. Worse, printed books can't update—finding deeper explanations requires separate supplementary materials, fragmenting learning. ### Five Advantages of AI Personal Textbooks ✅ **Fully Customized**: Include only topics and difficulty levels you need, skipping known content to focus on learning goals. ✅ **Context-Relevant**: Generate practical cases and applications based on your professional background (Engineer, PM, Entrepreneur). ✅ **Interactive Learning**: Automatically generate chapter summaries, key takeaways, and self-quizzes, turning passive reading into active learning. ✅ **Continuously Updatable**: Find a chapter too shallow? Ask AI to add deeper explanations or new examples anytime. ✅ **Offline Reading**: Export as PDF or EPUB to read on Kindle, tablets, or e-readers without internet limits. **Real Case**: After deploying AI-assisted textbooks at UCLA in 2024, student engagement rose significantly, and teachers saved time for individual mentoring ([Inside Higher Ed](https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/learning-assessment/2024/12/13/ai-assisted-textbook-ucla-has-some-academics)). Despite initial criticism, students and teachers validated the value of personalized learning materials. --- ## No-Code Workflow: 3 Steps to Your Textbook This workflow has three stages: **Ingest** → **Outline** → **Expand & Format**. All tools use web interfaces; no coding required. You can use any familiar AI tool (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.); steps below indicate applicable tools. ### Step 1: Collect & Organize Materials (NotebookLM) **Tool**: [Google NotebookLM](https://notebooklm.google/) (**Completely Free**, 100 notebooks, 50 sources/notebook, 500K words each) NotebookLM is Google's AI research assistant for organizing and analyzing large data. Compared to direct ChatGPT or Claude, NotebookLM's advantages are: - **Source Tracking**: Every summary cites sources for verification. - **Cross-Document Retrieval**: Upload multiple PDFs and web pages; AI builds an index automatically. - **Free & Unlimited**: Unlike ChatGPT Free's message limits. **Steps**: 1. Go to [NotebookLM](https://notebooklm.google/), login with Google. 2. Click "Create new notebook", name your project (e.g., "Data Analysis Self-Study"). 3. Upload materials: - **PDFs**: Papers, ebook chapters, specific old textbook chapters. - **Web Articles**: Paste URLs; NotebookLM extracts content automatically. - **Notes**: Import from Google Docs or paste text directly. 4. Use "Generate summary" to quickly grasp key points. 5. Use "Ask questions" to test AI understanding. E.g.: - "What are the core concepts here?" - "Which parts are for beginners? Which are advanced?" - "Any practical use cases?" > **💡 Tip**: If materials are in Chinese but you want an English textbook (or vice versa), NotebookLM handles cross-language retrieval. Just prompt in the target language. E.g., upload Chinese PDFs, ask in English, and NotebookLM answers in English. ### Step 2: Generate Structured Course Outline (Choose Your AI) Goal: Turn scattered materials into a logical outline. Don't be limited to one AI—use what you know. Mainstream tools ([Claude.ai](https://claude.ai/), [ChatGPT](https://chat.openai.com/), [Gemini](https://gemini.google.com/), [Mistral le Chat](https://chat.mistral.ai/)) all offer free tiers. **Example uses Claude.ai, but prompts work for ChatGPT & Gemini**. For advanced multi-AI strategies (e.g., different tools for different chapters), see [Multi-AI Collaboration Workflow](/posts/multi-ai-collaboration-workflow). #### Steps (Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini) 1. Open your chosen AI tool ([Claude.ai](https://claude.ai/) / [ChatGPT](https://chat.openai.com/) / [Gemini](https://gemini.google.com/)). 2. Start a new chat, use the "Learner Persona Template" prompt below. 3. Ask AI to generate an outline with: - **Chapter Titles** (H1/H2 structure) - **Learning Objectives per Chapter** - **Core Concept List** - **Self-Assessment Quizzes** (3-5 questions) #### Prompt Example: Learner Persona Template ```markdown I am a [Your Background, e.g., Software Engineer transitioning to Product Manager] wanting to learn [Topic, e.g., Data Analysis]. I have the following background knowledge: - Basic Python programming - SQL query syntax - Statistics concepts (Mean, Median, Standard Deviation) I want to focus on these application scenarios: - Analyzing user behavior data (Google Analytics) - Building A/B testing analysis frameworks - Visualization reporting (Tableau/Power BI) I have organized the following materials in NotebookLM: - [Paste NotebookLM summary or material list] Please design an 8-10 chapter textbook outline for me. Each chapter must include: 1. Chapter Title and Learning Objectives 2. Core Concept List (3-5 items) 3. Practical Cases (relevant to Product Management) 4. Self-Assessment Quiz (3-5 questions) Output in Markdown format, using H2 for chapters and H3 for subtopics. ``` #### Expected Output AI generates a structured Markdown outline, e.g.: ```markdown ## Chapter 1: Data Analysis Basics & Product Thinking ### Learning Objectives - Understand frameworks for data-driven decision making - Master North Star Metric definition methods - Distinguish vanity metrics from actionable metrics ### Core Concepts - North Star Metric - Funnel Analysis - Cohort Analysis ### Practical Case How a SaaS PM uses cohort analysis to find a churn spike on Day 7 and designs onboarding improvements... ### Self-Assessment 1. What is a North Star Metric? Give a product example you know. 2. Difference between vanity and actionable metrics? 3. How to use funnel analysis to find conversion bottlenecks? ``` > **⚠️ Key**: Don't just ask AI to "write a book." Explicitly define your background, goals, and context so AI generates a truly personalized outline. If unsatisfied, ask for adjustments: "Chapter 3 is too advanced, simplify for beginners" or "Add more practical cases to Chapter 5." ### Step 3: Expand Content & Generate Final Textbook (Book Platforms) Now that you have an outline, expand it into full content and export as PDF/EPUB. Two options: 1. **Free Manual Route**: Continue using ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini to generate content chapter-by-chapter, paste into Google Docs, export PDF. 2. **Platform Automation**: Use specialized AI book generation platforms for one-click generation and multi-format export. #### Platform Comparison | Tool | Free Plan | Paid Plan | Best For | |------|----------|----------|----------| | **[Youbooks](https://www.youbooks.com/)** | 10K words (Non-commercial, Open license) | Credit-based | Long-form content, needs source verification | | **[TailoredRead](https://tailoredread.com/)** | No free plan | $15/mo | Educators, training materials | | **[Type.ai](https://type.ai)** | 130K words | $12/mo (Unlimited) | Frequent editing, formatting adjustment | | **[Raptor Write](https://raptorwrite.com/)** | Completely Free | No paid version | Beginners, simple projects | #### Steps (Using Youbooks Example) 1. Go to [Youbooks](https://www.youbooks.com/), sign up (free trial available). 2. Click "Create New Book". 3. **Enter Basic Info**: - Book Type: "Educational / Textbook" - Target Audience: "Self-learner with [Your Background]" - Topic: [Topic] 4. **Paste your Outline from Step 2 (Claude / ChatGPT)**. 5. Adjust settings: - Content Depth: "Detailed with examples" - Include: "Self-assessment quizzes" - Tone: "Instructional, clear" - Sources: Check "Enable internet search" (Youbooks auto-searches and cites sources). 6. Click "Generate", wait 15-30 mins (depending on length). 7. **Review Generated Content**, use built-in editor to: - Delete irrelevant chapters/paragraphs. - Add personal experience/cases (AI can't provide this). - Adjust tone/difficulty. 8. **Export Formats**: - PDF (Print/Tablet) - EPUB (Kindle/Kobo e-readers) > **💰 Money-Saving Strategy**: Use free Claude.ai / Gemini for outline and first few chapters, then use Youbooks free trial (10K words) for the rest. For unsatisfactory sections, regenerate in Claude/ChatGPT and paste manually to save subscription costs. --- ## Tool Selection Guide: Which Combo Fits You? ### Combo 1: Completely Free Route (Recommended for Beginners) **Toolchain**: NotebookLM (Materials) → **Gemini Free** (Outline + Content, 100% Free) → Raptor Write (Expansion) → Google Docs (Manual Integration) → PDF Export **Cost**: $0 **Time**: 4-6 Hours (Manual integration) **Target**: Trial users, limited budget, one-off projects. **Pros**: - ✅ 100% Free, no hidden costs. - ✅ Gemini 2.5 Flash Free has daily allowance, good for occasional use. - ✅ Full control over quality (manual chapter review). **Cons**: - ❌ Manual copy-pasting (time-consuming). - ❌ Formatting requires manual work. ### Combo 2: Mixed Free/Paid (Recommended for Most) **Toolchain**: NotebookLM (Free) → **Claude.ai / ChatGPT Free** (Outline) → Youbooks Free 10K Trial (First few chapters) → Type.ai Free (Edit + Supplement) → EPUB/PDF Export **Cost**: $0 (or Youbooks pay-per-use) **Time**: 2-3 Hours **Target**: Balance quality vs. cost, need professional formatting. **Pros**: - ✅ Higher quality (Claude/ChatGPT structure is strong). - ✅ High automation (Youbooks/Type.ai handle layout). - ✅ EPUB format ideal for Kindle. **Cons**: - ⚠️ Strategic use of free limits (10K word cap). ### Combo 3: Professional Grade (Educators / Long-term) **Toolchain**: NotebookLM (Free) → **Claude Pro / ChatGPT Plus / Gemini Advanced** ($20/mo, pick one) → TailoredRead ($15/mo) → Direct Multi-format Export **Cost**: $35/mo **Time**: 1-2 Hours **Target**: Teachers, trainers, batch generating multiple textbooks. **Pros**: - ✅ Highest quality (Paid AI output stable). - ✅ TailoredRead designed for education, supports templates. - ✅ Cost amortized over multiple books. **Cons**: - ⚠️ Fixed monthly cost. ### Decision Matrix | Your Need | Recommended Combo | |----------|----------| | Completely free, willing to manual integr. | Combo 1 (Gemini + Raptor Write + Google Docs) | | Limited budget, one-off project | Combo 2 (Claude/ChatGPT Free + Youbooks 10K Trial) | | Long-term, multiple books | Combo 3 (Claude Pro + TailoredRead) | | Teaching use, need templates | Combo 3 (TailoredRead specialist) | --- ## Quality Control: Ensuring Accuracy AI content may contain errors, outdated info, or "hallucinations." UCLA's study noted AI textbooks "require significant editing." 5-Step Verification Process: ### Step 1: Fact Check - ✅ **Source all stats**: Ask AI for links, verify manually. - ✅ **Cross-reference technical concepts**: Check official docs (e.g., GA metrics, API usage). - ✅ **Timeliness Check**: Ensure info is current (train data lags). **Action**: Ask AI "Source for this stat? Link please." If unavailable, verify via Google or delete. ### Step 2: Logic Check - Are chapters coherent? (Does Ch3 use terms defined in Ch1?) - Contradictions? (Ch2 says "Use Method A", Ch5 says "Method A not recommended"?) - Logical difficulty curve? (No sudden jumps to advanced). ### Step 3: Case Verification - Are examples realistic? (Do codes run? Is analysis flow practical?) - Missing details? (e.g., "Use pandas read CSV" but forgot `import pandas`). **Action**: Pick 2-3 key cases, run them yourself. If issues found, regenerate with detail requests. ### Step 4: Quiz Testing - Take the self-assessment yourself. - Ensure answers are clear/correct (avoid ambiguity). - Difficulty matches content (no out-of-scope questions). ### Step 5: 3rd Party Review (Optional) - Ask a peer/colleague to scan for obvious errors. - Use ChatGPT/Claude for "Reverse Validation": Paste content, ask "What errors or inaccuracies exist here?" > **⚠️ Critical Limit**: AI can hallucinate stats, titles, or sources. Manually verify all key info. Treat AI as a draft tool, not final answer. --- ## Advanced Tips: Level Up Your Textbook ### Visual Elements - **Charts & Flowcharts**: Use [Canva](https://www.canva.com/) (Free) or [Excalidraw](https://excalidraw.com/) (Open Source). - **AI Illustrations**: DALL-E (ChatGPT Plus) or Midjourney for covers/chapter art. - **Video Links**: For PDF, add QR codes linking to YouTube tutorials. ### Interactive Quizzes - **Online Quizzes**: Create [Google Forms](https://forms.google.com/), link in textbook. - **Spaced Repetition Cards**: Export vocab/concepts to [Anki](https://apps.ankiweb.net/). ### Personal Learning Dashboard - **Progress Tracking**: Use [Notion](https://www.notion.so/) for progress, dates, understanding (1-5), questions. - **Regular Review**: Weekly NotebookLM "Q&A" self-test ("What did I learn in Ch3?"). ### Update Strategy - Review every 3 months for new cases/tool updates (e.g., GA4 UI changes). - If peers use your book, gather feedback for v2. > **💡 Extension**: This workflow isn't just for textbooks. The logic "Ingest → Structure → Expand" applies to travel planning, project research, etc. See [AI Travel Planning Guide](/posts/ai-travel-planning-guide) for similar information organization. --- ## Risks & Limits ### Cost - **Free Limits**: Claude.ai message caps, Youbooks 10K word limit. - **Long-term Costs**: Batch generation costs $15-30/mo. - **Hidden Time**: Review/adjustments take 2-4 hours even with free tools. ### Quality - **Inaccuracies/Outdated**: Stats/Tech details need manual verification. - **Editing Required**: Significant editing needed for teaching standards. - **Generic Examples**: AI cases may lack depth/practicality, needing personal experience. ### Learning Effect - **No Human Mentor**: provides structure but no real-time feedback. - **No Peers**: Lack of discussion; pairing with online communities recommended. - **Self-Discipline**: Requires self-drive without deadlines/exams. ### Privacy - **Cloud Risk**: Data uploaded to NotebookLM/AI platforms sits on cloud. - **Sensitive Info**: Check privacy policies for company/personal data. - **Commercial Use**: Check TOS; most free plans are personal use only. > **💡 Suggestion**: Use AI textbooks as "supplementary materials," not the sole resource. Combine with courses (Coursera/Udemy), projects, and communities (Reddit/Discord) for best results. Treat it as a personalized "Reference Manual." --- ## FAQ **Q1: Can I do this with zero tech skills?** A: Yes! All tools have web interfaces. If you can use Google Docs and copy-paste, you can do this. Simplest combo: NotebookLM (Upload PDF) → Gemini (Free, ask for outline) → Google Docs (Manual organize) → Export PDF. **Q2: How long does it take?** A: - **Basic** (Outline + Some content): 1-2 Hours - **Complete** (8-10 Chaps + Quizzes): 4-6 Hours (over days) - **Refined** (Visuals + Personal Cases): 10+ Hours Time is mainly spent on quality review, not AI generation. **Q3: Is Free enough? Best AI?** A: - **100% Free**: NotebookLM + Gemini 2.5 Flash Free + Raptor Write. - **Quality First**: NotebookLM + Claude.ai Free (Best for ed content). - **Familiarity**: Use what you know (ChatGPT/Gemini/Claude). - **Conclusion**: Free tiers suffice for one-off projects. Consider paid for long-term/batch needs. **Q4: Can I sell/share this?** A: Most platforms (Claude/Gemini/Youbooks) allow personal/non-commercial share. Commercial use check TOS. Suggest adding "AI-Assisted Generation" disclaimer and ensuring human review. **Q5: Multi-language?** A: Yes! Specify target language in prompts. Claude/ChatGPT/Gemini/Youbooks support multi-language. Gemini excels in non-English (CN/JP/KR). **Q6: Want more customization/automation?** A: If you have tech background, check our advanced guide: [Developers' AI Textbook Automation Workflow](/posts/ai-textbook-automation-developers). Covers Claude Code, Pandoc, Python scripts for batch/version control/custom formats. --- ## Conclusion: Build Your Path You now have the toolchain to generate a no-code personalized textbook in 1-2 hours—no more spending $60 for 30% usage. **3 Steps to Action**: 1. **Start Today**: Go to [NotebookLM](https://notebooklm.google/), upload first material (PDF/Note/URL). 2. **Generate Outline**: Use [Gemini](https://gemini.google.com/) (Free) or [Claude.ai](https://claude.ai/) to generate/test outline. 3. **Choose Path**: If satisfied, pick a platform (Youbooks / TailoredRead / Manual Google Docs) to expand. **Remember**: AI is a powerful assistant, but quality control and personalization require YOU. Treat AI textbooks as a start, not the end. Add your experience, cases, and insights to create true value. > **🔧 For Developers**: Need automation/version control/Custom CSS? Check [Developer's AI Textbook Automation](/posts/ai-textbook-automation-developers). Covers Claude Code, Pandoc, Python scripts ([nihongo-claude](https://github.com/chiweitw/nihongo-claude)). **Start your personalized learning journey**—break free from generic textbooks, build materials that fit YOU with AI. --- ## Self-Hosted AI Assistant Guide: OpenClaw vs. NanoClaw vs. Nanobot vs. PicoClaw Security & Performance Comparison (2026) URL: https://www.shareuhack.com/en/posts/openclaw-alternatives-guide Date: 2026-02-17 Tools: OpenClaw, NanoClaw, Nanobot, PicoClaw, Docker, Anthropic Claude, Model Context Protocol Concepts: Self-Hosted AI Assistant, Container Security, MCP Protocol, Embedded AI, Prompt Injection, Resource Optimization, AI Agent Architecture ### Summary Behind OpenClaw's viral success lie 512 security vulnerabilities and resource bloat. This guide provides a security-first decision framework, comparing lightweight alternatives NanoClaw, Nanobot, and PicoClaw to help you choose the best self-hosted AI assistant. ### Content # Self-Hosted AI Assistant Guide: OpenClaw vs. NanoClaw vs. Nanobot vs. PicoClaw Security & Performance Comparison (2026) OpenClaw